PastorBrotherBob refutes... a baptist

PLEASE READ THE DEFENSE:

The word "made" in Mark 2:27 alludes back to creation week. Therefore when the verse continues and says... "for MAN," the "man" Jesus is speaking about is Adam and Eve, the "first man" created in creation week:

Genesis 5:1-2
(1) This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;
(2) Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam (Hebrew: first man), in the day when they were created.

This text shows both the man and the women were called "first man."

The word "man" in Mark 2:27 means "a human being, whether male or female" and is in the general/plural sense holding the additional meaning of "all human individuals, a people."

Therefore, it was not made for the Jews, but rather for "all of mankind" and given to mankind's first parents, or "first man," Adam and Eve at the creation week: Genesis 2:1-3.

This is according to Thayer's Greek New Testament Definitions and Strong's Concordance.

_________________________________

-Who do you want PastorBrotherBob to refute next (i.e. Penticostal, Methodist, Catholic, etc)?

-What objection against the Sabbath would you like him to address?

Place your answers in the comment bar or send your request to my inbox. The objection I get the most, or the one with the most "thumbs up" in the comment bar will be addressed by PastorBrotherBob in the next video. I'll choose one by April 10th!

Bible Defense of the faith once delivered unto the saints:
www.adventistdefenseleague.com
www.ourhighercallingministry.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• PastorBrotherBob
• preachers
• church
• bible
• teaching
• cartoon
• animation
• refute
• objection
• sabbath
• critic
• opponant
• evangelical
• baptist
• penticostal

[AdventistDefense]

jkw733 looks like yours will be the next one. Immortality of the Soul and the State of the dead.

[Jondadon2006]

are you still in processing of doing immortality of the soul? God bless AD

[AdventistDefense]

my computer caught a nasty virus bro, I cant even start up the programs I need to make videos. As soon as I get that resolved Ill get back to aking videos. Please pray for this...

[jkw733]

Cool vid!

Since nearly everybody believes in the supposed immortality of the soul (I believe someone added the " t " there, and the correct word was immorALITY, which I WILL accept!), how about refuting THAT sometime?

[AdventistDefense]

great idea....

[RemixtLatino]

Myhopeisinhim: I guess using this logic, we must also conclude we can kill, steal, commit adultery, covet, disrespect our parents freely, take the name of God in vain, put other gods before Him, break His Sabbath, bear false witness.. just let all sorts of sin and chaos rule.

Bad idea..

... isnt it...

"out of date and ready to be put aside". Imagine that :(

[pkunzie]

There is great Truth in this video.

However, it is too bad that the video portrays the Baptist as YELLING at PastorBrotherBob. Was it necessary to put Baptists in such a negative (ANGRY) light, in an attempt to share the Sabbath truth?

I pray that you will consider this when making other videos...

God bless...

[Myhopeisinhim]

We have a new covenant and he shares with us there what is required of us. The new covenant is not exactly like the old, otherwise we'd still be performing sacrifices and circumcision.

[lillibeth13]

Oops, forgot to mention that Jesus is the same TODAY, YESTERDAY, and FOREVER. (Hebrews 13:8)

Your view cannot win because if you speak not according to the LAW and to the TESTIMONY (Isaiah 8:20), there is no LIGHT in you and this LIGHT is Jesus (John 8:12).

Therefore if you reject the LAW and the TESTIMONY, you don't have Jesus Christ in you as the LIGHT of the World, for you refuse to keep the Sabbath which is part of the LAW (Exodus 20:8-11; Mark 2:27-28; Luke 23:56)

Game over.

[lillibeth13]

Wrong AGAIN, Patricia.

I refute all your verses all the time anyways.

First of all, Deut. 4:13 states that the God's covenant had ALSO (meaning separate or as well) ORDINANCES of divine service. Which stood in MEAT, AND DRINK, AND DIVERS WASHINGS UNTIL THE TIME OF REFORMATION (Hebrews 9:1,10; Colossians 2:14-16)

Therefore the word "[even] points out that the first covenant had the ten commandments PLUS the ceremonial aspect of it (Deut.29:1); in this case the opposite being Ten C's.

[lillibeth13]

Ephesians 5:6 will most certainly fit with myhopeisinhim as well as Mark 7:7.

Patricia's doctrine is both unbiblical and preposterous and most certainly contrary to the teachings of the LORD Jesus Christ (Col. 2:9; Matthew 5:17-19; Psalms 119:142; Revelation 22:14).

[lillibeth13]

However, Hebrews 8:7-12 parallels a prophecy in Jeremiah 31:31-33 where God declares He will put His LAWS into our hearts.

Therefore, the written form of the Law has been done away with, including the Book of the Law of Moses which is SEPARATE from the Ten Commandments (Deut.29:1; Deut. 31:26; Colossians 2:14)

However, the Law has been placed in our hearts and minds and when the Holy Spirit comes to us afterwards we love to obey Him (John 14:15). Romans 3:31: We do NOT abolish the Law.

[sweetwarriors]

I like this video, it is God inspired! Truth is so soothing to my soul, Thank you!

[rickydepths1]

lol I like this vid its pleasant...

[PrayerisLoveinaction]

ADL~EXCELLENT vid, I like Pastor Bob's approach of using Scripture instead of using someone else's interpretation. It is not about us, but it is about having a real one on one relationship with our Heavenly Father. I see that some have no concept of the Commandments of YHWH. His Commandments tell us His character, and He tells us through His Commands how to Worship Him, and when. Mostly, how we are to love Him and our brothers and sisters. It was the ceremonial laws that Christ took away for us.