Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Israeli Professor Shlomo Sand talks to George Galloway about the Invention of Jewish People -

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,456
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (245)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost ALL have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews."

    - League of Nations 1920 Interim Report

    -> "Almost ALL (Jews) entered during last 40 years!"

    ZIONISTS GO BACK TO EUROPE

  • @johnsde1 You:Why do you keep sending more scriptures but wont address this one!Me: Because you moron, as I've told you before, this is not part of the original bible. Why should I address something which was written almost 1,700 years AFTER the original encoded Hebraic text?Why don't you bring quotes from the Qur'an&ask me to address the crap in that?You refer to the original text (that you can't understand) as a story (& in your format it sadly is)yet you misquote from it to justify race crap.

  • @mrtruthforever ;YOU 've engaged you hoping that you were objective/humble enough to realize that all your opinions are based on mistranslations/recent English texts with political & profit motives ME: No, think that these political & profit motives were in place a long time. As i have mentioned, the Hamitic curse was put in place for the implementation of slavery and today politically, Israel DEFEATS peace in the Middle East.

  • @mrtruthforever YOU:Man, you are so screwed up. Somebody took some afrocentric political ideology & rammed it down your throat so deep that you have no ability (or humility) to objectively search the original sources for truth. ME I can say the same for you! You believe a STORY that has been rammed down your throat so deep you have no ability to objectively search FOR TRUTH. I search for truth with science, genetics, history, anthropolgy & you want to look at your ancient text!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU If Abraham & his offspring were 2,000 years BC, then how can "Jews"(English bastardization of Judah) be an AD people? ME: This is EXACTLY my point! This is a fact presented by Todays scientist AND NOT MY OPINION!, White skin only turned recently! White been around on 6-12k years. You can come to whatever conclusion you want to but i do know the Khazars were not there!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: Here's the reference (but it won't help you much since you rely on Greek & Roman translations to English of the original Hebraic coded text-proving your strong ties to the language, traditions, religion LOL): ME So youre telling me that every bible is wrong and youre right with your original Hebraic coded text. As i mentioned, unless youre speaking of ANCIENT HEBREW, your coded text means nothing, its just another TRANSLATION. Maybe even JUST Yiddish! LOL

  • @mrtruthforever Why do you keep sending more scriptures but wont adress this one!

    Rev 2: (9) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the BLASPHEMY of them WHICH SAY THEY ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT, BUT, [are] THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN. Rev 3:(9) Behold, I will make them of the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: .The references of the promises reiterated over & over that the land was given to the offspring of Israel & not Canaan are many. ME: Stop being ridiculous! Canaan IS THE ANCIENT NAME FOR ISRAEL. Your ISRAELI people DID NOT EXIST AT THIS TIME. The inhabitant of the land at this time were Afrikans. You do know that HAM, progenitor of the black races (ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE!), begat Canaan, who also named is city CANAAN & his people Canaanites NOT KHAZARS!!!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: Canaan was the son of Ham ME: Your point being what? You are merely stating what i have said all along! Ham was the progenitor of the black races according to the bible and the HAMITIC CURSE. Well if the father is black, then the son is black. The Canaanites settled in Canaan. This nothing more than NE Afrika! Name then changed to Palestine/Israel. European Khazars WERE NOT THERE!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: Judah is of the nation of Israel. Israel & its language (Hebrew-English bastidarization of the word Evrew) come from Ever from Shem (that's where antishemi-antisemite is derived from).ME: THIS IS NOT THE DISPUTE! The dispute ARE the fake Khazars pretending to be the Hebrews of ancient Canaan/Palestine/Israel. As I have mentioned, Most European Khazars are CONVERTS and NOT semetic AT ALL!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: but because you're disingenuous & want to remain ignorant.Jew (English version of word referring to one coming from Judah. ME: THIS TOO IS A LIE! This was a CLEAVER way to attach the Eurocentric, 7th Century Khazar converts to the ancient Hebrews of the bible, however, science has caught to the lies but you want people to accept your FAKE bible story as truth!

  • @johnsde1 Here's the reference (but it won't help you much since you rely on Greek & Roman translations to English of the original Hebraic coded text-proving your strong ties to the language, traditions, religion LOL):.The references of the promises reiterated over & over that the land was given to the offspring of Israel & not Canaan are many. Let's start with בראשית. יב-א,ג-ז, If the original reference doesn't help you, then go find a "Canaanite" to help you translate.Where's you original ref?

  • @johnsde1 The point moron, was that the Bible you misquoted to try & prove that Israel belongs to "Canaan" (because of your skin color), conveniently omiting all the passages stating Gd promised the land to the descendats of Israel) stated that humanity will be blessed through them (not Canaan). So I asked you, rhetorically, how many Nobel prizes for humanity came from Canaan-who contributed no blessing to humanity:Is that who you belong to?

  • @johnsde1 You're quite disturbed Not only because you insist that Sands, a French literature teacher is an expert on the history of the nation of Israel, but because you're disingenuous & want to remain ignorant.Jew (English version of word referring to one coming from Judah. Judah is of the nation of Israel. Israel & its language (Hebrew-English bastidarization of the word Evrew) come from Ever from Shem (that's where antishemi-antisemite is derived from). Canaan was the son of Ham.

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: see that you claim yourself to be the "true" Jew but you don't even have the most basic of knowledge to distinguish what was given by Gd at Sinai. ME Neither do KHAZARS. You said i was fixated on skin color. Well its important because the Conquest of Canaan took place from 1473 B.C. to 1117 B.C. YOU DO REALIZE THAT WHITE SKIN DID NOT EXIST! Europeans like JEWS are only 6-12k and are strictly AD people. How could these people be the HEBREWS??? LOL

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: And they came to the land of Canaan..The Canaanite was then in the land...Gd appeared &said to Abram To your offsping I will give this land (not the Canaanites)". ME: BIBLE NAME AND VERSION. DONT FORGET TO PROVIDE THE PASSAGE.

  • @mrtruthforever. YOU: (btw, how many nobel prizes in medicine, bio.physics, have come from Canaanites?)..ME: Now this is a silly question. Canaanites were an ancient people who were taken into slavery. Stop pretending that modern jews are canaanites. The bible you love to reference, tells you exactly who Canaan was and where the name of the city came from and the people who settled there!

  • @mrtruthforever YOU: Sands should go back to teaching ME: You pretend that Sands is the only scholar saying this...Are you joking. Sands is one of your own, he is just not saying what you want to believe.

  • @johnsde1 Rather than quoting some childish English translation, cite the tractate, not a racist distortion.

  • @johnsde1 Gd said to Abram "Go for yourself from your and, from your relatives, and from your father's house to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation; I will bless you, ...and you shall be a blessing" (btw, how many nobel prizes in medicine, bio.physics, have come from Canaanites?).."And they came to the land of Canaan..The Canaanite was then in the land...Gd appeared &said to Abram To your offsping I will give this land (not the Canaanites)".

  • @johnsde1 I see that you claim yourself to be the "true" Jew but you don't even have the most basic of knowledge to distinguish what was given by Gd at Sinai and what was written by non-Jews about 1,300 years afterward & is not part of the encoded Hebraic revelation.Sands should go back to teaching French Literature.

  • @mrtruthforev The Jewish Babylonian Talmud "[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational animals. To my mind they do not have the rank of men, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man but higher than the rank of apes. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that is superior to that of the apes."

  • @mrtruthforever ME: In accordance with the Jewish Babylonian Talmud - Talmudic rabbis promoted their version of the Hamitic Curse to justify the ancient Hebrew enslavement of the Canaanites. Now accordance of the Bible, JUST WHO ARE THE CANAANITES. Ummm, I believe them to be descendants of HAM...WHO WERE BLACK! Now the Bible, History, Anthropology and Genetics say WHO the Hebrew of the Bible were BUT I SHOULD BELIEVE YOU??! Canaan is where Palestine/Israel is today, NE Afrika!!

  • @mrtruthforever ME: This looks pretty clear to me!!!! NOW WHY SHOULDNT I LISTEN TO SANDS?

    Rev 2: (9) I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the BLASPHEMY of them WHICH SAY THEY ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT, BUT, [are] THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN. Rev 3:(9) Behold, I will make them of the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

  • @johnsde1 Regarding the Talmud, if you want a serious factual answer, then send me a message with your question & reference & I will try to answer it as best I can from the original source. Don't just throw out blanket accusations, unless you just want to stay biased & ignorant. Regarding Rev, it is not part of the original encoded Hebraic text. It was written long after the original Hebraic encoded text was revealed.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more