That one's right, this one's wrong

"Virtually all current policy statements from specialty societies and medical organizations do not recommend routine neonatal circumcision, and support the provision of accurate and unbiased information to parents to inform their choice." Cut from Tubers vids to speak for those who cannot.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• don't
• cut
• penis
• hubris
• please
• uncut
• pain
• babies
• horror

[berkawoo]

The word uncircumcised/uncut implies validation of circumcision. That it is the norm (which it is not.)

The use of the word "intact" or natural penis with a foreskin should be more often used than the work uncircumcised.

INTACT = normal natural, what nature intended.Good Parents

Circumcised/Cut = mutilated, damaged and violated. Ignorant Parents.

[panzer903]

wow the blond chic is smarter than the brunette

[lethel4444]

earrign peircing is mutilation too :) i'd let my children choose when they are grown up

[lethel4444]

dear fellow female; was i looking for this topic- no; but i found it; and OMG, i'm an idiot; this is the first time i ever saw a 'natural' penis. I kept hearing about this 'clean thing' and stuff and i thought the skin was jus ton the tip covering the ding; but i didn't know it was a sheath; OMG;

and apparently i've no experience to know; today I actually LEARNED something new; BUT the second person talking messes up the video that you explain so well and clearly

[RockoMyler]

@Pimpmastahanhduece The glans is the LEAST sensitive part of the penis and the frenulum is often destroyed in circumcisions. The ridged band of the foreskin is where the lion's share of the Meissner's Corpuscles, which sense fine touch, are located.

[Pimpmastahanhduece]

@RockoMyler the most sensitive parts are the frenulum and the glans.

[RockoMyler]

@Pimpmastahanhduece The foreskin features the five most sensitive parts of a man's penis. In what way is it a "nuisance"?

[Pimpmastahanhduece]

@RockoMyler when did i say that something you can survive without is automatically also vestigial?Why do people get liver transplants, obviously the liver is still functioning until the moment its removed or else a dead body would arrive at the surgeon's table. But it is removed because its function has been deemed more a problem than a benefit. Your eyes, arms, and legs are tremendously useful, a foreskin is just a nuisance, like wisdom teeth too crooked to even chew.

[RockoMyler]

@Pimpmastahanhduece Just because you can live without a body part, doesn't mean it doesn't have a function. If you wanted to, you can live without your arms, legs, and eyes, but that doesn't mean you haven't lost something by missing all of those bits. I did make a point, but apparently you were too dense to see it.

[smssuper]

fuck u,, why did u mix 2 videos in one.

[Pimpmastahanhduece]

@RockoMyler umm, you made no point. you essentially said, "my opinion = good, your opinion = bad". i could just say "Oh, but I do have a reason, and a mighty fine one at that. By suggesting that a foreskin, a body part you can live without, isNT either vestigial or inconvenience, makes you the very definition naive. Or maybe just willfully ignorant."

You assume I think its wrong to have a foreskin. I simply dont think not having it is wrong. Let the record show, no point was made.

[RockoMyler]

@Pimpmastahanhduece Oh, but I do have a reason, and a mighty fine one at that. By suggesting that a normal body part is either vestigial or inconvenience makes you the very definition naive. Or maybe just willfully ignorant.