Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

sAviOr[gm] vs Daezang[GnH] @ MSL

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
20,295
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 28, 2006

September 26th 2006, PringlesMSL R8, Daezang[GnH] vs sAviOr[gm] @ Sin Peaks of Baekdu

sAviOr[gm] won Casy and finished 2nd in his group, Daezang won JJu and finished 1st in his group, now they have to fight for loser/winner bracket placement for the BO3 rounds.

Winner of this match will face the winner of Kingdom vs Silver ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_7GYA9gw6g ), and loser will play vs the loser of that same match but will also have to play another match (losing either one means elimination)

Let the fun begin! the first R8 is also the last BO1, from now on its all BO3 (Best of 3), and this is how it goes: first round of the R8 means both the winners and the losers will advance to the BO3 stage, but the winners will have a better chance (they can still lose a game and get a second chance to advance to BO5 level), while the losers can't effort to lose anymore after this, plus every loser will have to play an extra game or two- and every 2nd loser will be eliminated.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • He made huge mistake by not blocking saviors ramp when he beat his natural, this way his reinforcements would be stuck in main.

  • The toss attacked the sunkens at the end because he had already lost. He did an "all-in" strategy; he did an early 4 gate zealot rush and played really aggressively, sacrificing his economy (no expansion). After his first two attacks failed he had already lost the game; he was too far behind. He had nothing to lose by attacking at the end.

see all

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 3:17 SEX~~~!

  • Holy crap the graphics were terrible back then! ~It has improved so much more with SC2. Well that being said nearly 10 years has passed...lol

  • why didnt he get +1?

  • he woulda won extremely easily if he invested 100 more gas to get +1

  • To all those saying templar or reaver/shuttle, realise that toss committed to a 4 gate timing attack with zealots legs, this build was very much all in at that time as the toss forces the zerg to build lings. There was no sair/reaver build at that time and if this all in failed and toss would be on 1 base without any cannons to counter the in coming mutas.

  • The protoss build was a very all-in strategy. If you watch closely, he was only mining enough gas to get zealot legs and nothing more, in order to support four gateways from one base. throughout the game he was unable to set up the protoss ball or wall that is needed to defeat zerglings. Savoir was able to pull off great surrounds on his zealots with his zergling micro.

    It is almost necessary to have two bases to support a reaver harass, because it is so gas heavy.

  • trust me he is not a noob if he could he would have done so

  • one of the shocking games of savior.. commentators kept saying.. ' if protoss cant defeat savior by this way.. there is no other way to defeat this guy'

  • or make templars?????

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more