More Child Sex is their SOLUTION
Loading...
12,856
Loading...
Uploader Comments (TylerNull)
Top Comments
-
The blond woman is totally right . Im not even a religious person i'm just an agnostic, and the moral decline of the west due to insane liberalism is vile. its even worse over here in the UK .
-
If abstinence only is good enough for Sarah Palin's kids, it's good enough for me!
Oh wai...
see all
All Comments (99)
-
Anorexia is not the crisis we were led to believe.
-
what is wrong with that?
-
1st of, abstinence only education is not being taught in school right now, i'm 23 and had an unlimited supply of condoms from my health teacher all through high school(who showed the class how to put a condom on with your mouth!?!) This is disgusting and she is saying this because pop culture says to have sex? Why not confront that issue.
Loading...
whats wrong with safe sex during teen years?
sex has many health benifits if done safely .
young teenagers are educated well enough let them do as they wish
ishkalola 2 years ago
whats wrong with safe rape during teen years?
Reciting idiotic mantras, like "safe sex", endlessly until they appear to make sense to the afflicted devotee isn't good for anyone.
Teen pregnancies and STD's have skyrocketed hundreds of percent since Liberals began proselytizing their promiscuity-only theology.
TylerNull 2 years ago
Wow. I have never seen a more shamed, used, broken woman than Laura. She cannot even say the words "oral sex" without getting "sick." If anyone needs to have a good romp in the sheets, it's Laura Ingrahm.
gombis666 3 years ago
"...shamed, used, broken ..." -- a rather bizarre set of adjectives to describe one who thinks children shouldn't be sexualized.
Clearly, you project.
TylerNull 3 years ago
It must be "my project" because I don't agree with her? Cmon...you can do better than that! Or maybe you can't.
gombis666 3 years ago
No, it's not A project", It's "project", as in a projection onto others.
Specifically, it's you projecting your "shamed, used, broken ..." state upon the source of your ineffectual rage.
Were you not so "shamed, used, broken ...", then you would address the point with which you now claim to disagree, instead of spewing ad hominem.
The fact that you didn't, then or now, verifies my observation. The fact that you attempt the same against the one who noticed -- namely me -- is further evidence.
TylerNull 3 years ago