Yes! The Earth is Expanding. Part 6 of 14.
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
according to mainstream science the young small rock size earth was rotating the sun, gathering dust, asteroids, comets, getting bigger & producing all sorts of stuff due to its materials & became the earth. billions of years later the solar system is still full of matter that can be attracted. the earth also has the same gravity. But by some mysterious court "STOP" order the earth has stopped all activity & is sleeping. all equations balanced. BULLSHIT!
-
I love to see people talk it out and help one another understand because that is what being human is all about. I would guess science isn't just sticking to one thing forever, it's about questioning everything even our teachers before us thousands of years ago we probably thought one thing to another until today and were still questioning and will be questioned by future generations to come. See what we can do in the modern day but the future is going to be even more amazing with new tools ect.
-
LMAO People who hold on so tight to old beliefs are just like people who still think the world is flat!!! Clear your mind of what you think is true because someone told you and listen to what someone else is saying, from 1/14 of the clips here and truly look at the facts and see which ones you think are better before making a quick decision. I would like to say I'm still thinking for myself about everything that is out there and trying to make sense of it all to make my own theory of life.
-
@lostbuffalo This made absolutely no sense at all...
-
It is highly feasable for light energy leaving the sun and more probably manipulation of space fabric within the earth by earths dynamic magnetic field coupling with that of the suns..for the nuclear reactions within the sun to fuel the creation of matter within the core of the earth.
whatever is happening in the core of the earth is something that can only happen in that dynamic environment. It cannot happen in the core of a dead planet.
-
space fabric impedes light without absorbing light or it's energy and limits it's speed to what we measure as the speed of light. without space light would have infinite speed.
mass isn't just created out of light..Mass is created out of space by bending space into sperical waveforms we call electrons, photons, protons, and neutrons, and other subatomic particles.
when these waveforms of space-light collapse they return to static space and give off the creating light in linear rays.
-
From Pangea earth size to present -where the land mass is staying roughly the same, where does all the extra water come from to keep the ocean levels from severely lowering? The area of the earth is increasing with the square of the radius increase, yet the water seems to "fill in " the holes and stay at sea level. What?
-
@techgeol Not sure if it counts as evidence, but no scientist has been able to extract core samples from the sea floor older than 70 million years. Getting closer and closer to the fault lines the core samples get younger and younger. Once you get onland, older cores are easily found. This is if nothing else a strong indicator of Mr. Maxlows theory. Peace :)
-
Another point to discuss. Based on this video and the theory, there is another issue. The Earth seems to grow such as a balloon, which means a radial expansion from a single point (center). This means that the movement of continent can not provide such bizaroid displacements (India). The plate should also move with the same rate...take a balloon, paste pieces of paper & see the result after blowing.
-
From what I have seen so far. There are several point that do not match, if there is no drift, the continent are fixed. if there is an extension, there is only an increase of surface, especially ocean crust.. But even if the continent is fixed there is an extension with graben formation, no collision, so no mountain. Furthermore, the liquid water volume should be the same, taht does not match with eustatic variation in the past!
This theory is much more vital and self-explicative than the old, rather fusty, and totally untestable theory of continental drift.
The former theory has as its one asset: establishment.
The new theory requires some thought, it tends to revitalize, and will require the reassessment of a number of sciences.
It should be examined, tested widely and deeply (not merely argued verbally).
If it proves true, the benefits to all sciences and to the advancement of humankind will be extensive.
AgTip 3 years ago 18
Absolutely so much better. So many things the expanding or growing earth explains better than PT. Once you see it, you can't go back.
dehilster 3 years ago 10