Daniel Dennett on William Lane Craig

Following a presentation of theistic arguments by William Lane Craig, Daniel Dennett gives an impromptu appraisal.

Enjoy.

And don't forget to rate and subscribe.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• atheism
• religion
• God
• Christianity
• philosophy
• apologist
• causation
• cosmology
• cosmological
• argument
• Daniel
• Dennett
• William
• Lane
• Craig

[tdjdk]

@tdjdk

Now, if religious fanatics want to win (yeah, right), you should spend all those tithes and donations on research into how the singularity came to be, instead of using all those billions on propaganda. It is only if you can prove your particular god to be responsible for that singularity that you can win. By EVIDENCE, NOT claims, assertions and assumptions. It REALLY is that easy. I just think you are too scared at what you might find if you take a position of reason and skepticism

[foojuice101]

@parraphrase

Things that make me believe in evolution:

1. Evidence

2. Sound evidence

3. Overwhelming sound evidence

4. Overwhelming sound evidence and a backing from the members of the Royal Society

5. Overwhelming sound evidence and a backing from the members of the Royal Society plus the studies done by thousands of biologists over 150 years of evolutionary study

[allanhill1]

@B2tmfG And you also realize just how magnificent the universe is. It becomes more wonderous when one dicovers it is not designed or fabricated by any consious entity. It is natural

[B2tmfG]

The more one realizes that the universe has no rhyme, reason, or purpose; the easier it is to make sense of it.

[YamiYami17]

@heesamantha11 Don't get nerves,this is not a battle here,discussions are made to know where is the truth,it's not about wining or losing,so please don't get yourself astray by a wave of a self-pride.

"information such as a written text requires ingelligence. But the ïnformation in a DNAmoleucule does not" Information is information and it's an intellegent technic made only by an intellegent beings.Take your time to invastigate please.

[heesamantha11]

@YamiYami17 and there are selfreplicating RNA-molecules read a goddamn book.

[YamiYami17]

@wpk911 Explain please what "symbols" and what naming convention you have assigned ?

[heesamantha11]

@YamiYami17 your an idiot. you really are. just so it's clear I do agree that information such as a written text requires ingelligence. But the ïnformation in a DNAmoleucule does not.

I'm pretty sure the first form of heritable material was not DNA.

good luck with you religion bs.

[YamiYami17]

@heesamantha11 In fact my relegion told me to seek knowledge more than anything else,So i can know how great the creator is !

The bible and the torah are indeed revelations,but what we have now,is nor the torah nor the bible but books filled with non-sense corrupted by men and priests who are Jockeying for power. The third one which happens to be the last before jugment day,is preserved by god for over 1400 years,And it tells the truth about which have past and which will come.

[heesamantha11]

sorry, i wasn't really paying attention.

[heesamantha11]

@YamiYami17 sure. I think we are talking about a different book. Cause the one I read had vague prophecies and a lot of bs that can't be proven. And of course, for me to take an primitive book serious I would first need some proof that there is a God. which I have never found.

personally I think its bs but I'm sure you feel the same way about science.