Landing Runway 9 St. Maarten Boeing 747-400 (FSX)
Loading...
894
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (OliverKahnNr1)
see all
All Comments (10)
-
@commanderoffamily that is because his computer is much much better than yours
-
wow so high!
-
@OliverKahnNr1 hi, how do you change the acent of the atc?
-
how is your smooth fsx and mine is lagging fsx?
-
gutes video 5*
-
lol love the 30 retard thing lol
Loading...
Yo High Approach.
You have to look to the papi lichts 2red 2 white than you are goo on the glide slope
mitchellboon 2 years ago
Glidescopes are only available for ILS landing (the green scopes on the GPS). No, they were not available at TNCM. Yeah, I guess it was too high. Then again, better than too low (especially when trying not to hit people on the beach, cars or the fence).
OliverKahnNr1 2 years ago
The Gildescopes are for the ILS landing i know that.But you have to use it also voor Visual landings on TNCM.
mitchellboon 2 years ago
Yeah, I know what the lights are for. But I struck the fence when the lights were 2W/2R. O_o So I approached it higher for the "real deal" of recording. I don't know, FSX has some flaws. If you look closely, the instruments on the co-pilots side are wrong, i.e. they are exactly like the captain's. The co-pilot's instruments are supposed to be flipped, i.e. primary display right and course heading display on the left for co-pilot.
OliverKahnNr1 2 years ago
yea but is a visual approach you use the papi lights to indicate how high u are the Glidescopes are useful but the papi as any pilots now is the most resourceful landing espeacially for st maarten in small words that was too high for a st maarten flight because u have exit the taxiways very fast
foster32766 2 years ago
I made it, afterall. Not like Air France with their A340 in Toronto, Canada. And I didn't really see enough reasons for a go-around. xD Oh well, if I'd intend to become a commercial pilot, I'd still have many dozen years until Chief Captain of a quadruple-engine jet.
OliverKahnNr1 2 years ago