Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Port Arthur Massacre - The Conspiracies. 2/2.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,729
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 16, 2010

Radio guest works to debunk five of the most well-known conspiracy theories surrounding Martin Bryant and the Port Arthur Massacre.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (2WAYFM)

  • OK so why no trial and why were records of the event sealed for 30 yrs? You're just arguing by assertion and not backing it up with anything. Oh that's right, a trial would be disrespectful to the families. How often do they lock someone up without a trial because it would be disrespectful to the victim's family to have a trial? I think YOU"RE the one who's being disrespectful to the families.

  • @TheDamiandemos In Australia, if someone pleads guilty there is very very rarely a trial. We here don't have an opinion on this whole thing but it really is foolish when people say there wasn't a trial as if it was a conspiracy. It was a normal part of our legal process.

Top Comments

  • Further to my note below, the number of people that would have to be involved in such a cover-up would be massive, with details having to be documented in memorandums, etc. This is not something that could be arranged by word of mouth. So for it not to have leaked at all in all this time speaks highly against the conspiracy. Let's not forget the children overboard scandal, minute in comparison yet that still managed to leak to the public. Most of you are ignoring the big facts

see all

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the speakers a liar, 35 dead 22 wounded, doctors even said a shotgun was used too, in his police statement he says hes left handed this spook talking is a dumb cunt

  • the speakers a liar, 35 dead 22 wounded, doctors even said a shotgun was used too

  • Still waiting for those references and statistics, and an opinion as to why records have been sealed if the govt. isn't afraid of something. And it's quite precious the way your reply to my first question is at the top of the page, giving casual readers the impression it was the last word and I had no answer.

  • @2WAYFM Thanks for the info. Could we have references/statistics so we can decide if it is indeed "very very rare"? By definition that means exceptions are occasionally made-a retarded man accused of the worst gun massacre in Aust. history isn't enough for an exception to be made? I'm being foolish am I? Perhaps I would be if lack of a trial weren't part of a whole array of dodgy things about the PAM. On my other point, do you have any opinions as to why the records have been sealed?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more