Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Giuliani in 1989: There must be public funding for abortion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,683
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 11, 2007

Full story at http://www.thebluestate.com/2007/03/video_giuliani_.html

It looks like Rudolph Giuliani will have an even more difficult time getting the Republican nomination.

GIULIANI: "There must be public funding for abortion for poor women."

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Fucking disgusting. He can't just be pro-infanticide without stealing tax dollars for it.

    By the way I'm not pro-infanticide even if the woman pays. Abortion is murder period.

  • I don't know that that means with all the dashes and shit but if a woman is raped obviously that is not her fault.

    By the way I'm done arguing abortion is infanticide period. Unlike you liberals who protest and shit all day I have a job and things to do so I'll get back to you some other month.

see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • having a baby doesn't make you responsible

  • So, if a woman is raped, it must be her fault because she was at a certain place at a certain time. After all, it does take two to make a baby.

    Pro-innocent-human-American-un­less-it-helps-the-poor-or-rest­ricts-my-right-to-bare-arms-ex­cept-in-the-cases-of-rape-inse­st-or-the-life-of-the-mother-i­s-at-risk-life? Most Pro Life people are.

    "Don't think of it as an abortion; I like the term ovarian mulligan better"

    -Dennis Miller

  • So we should kill the baby because of his/her mothers irresponsibility?

    I think if you don't want a baby don't make one, it really isn't that hard. It takes more work to make one than it does to not have one in the first place.

    For the woman who decide to neglect their child because they couldn't kill him/her they state should remove the child from such a household.

  • Any woman who wants to have an abortion, and can't, isn't going to be taking very good care of a child they didn't want.

    For most people who want the ability to have abortions, it is less of a "I don't want a baby" and more along the lines of "I don't want you telling me I need a baby" Just my two cents.

  • Rudy doesn't, he is for a mothers decision of killing their pre-mature baby. It it murder, it is the modern day holocaust.

  • Ok, both sides need to stop it with the stupid political framing.

    No one is against choice, nor is anyone against life. It's for or against the ability to have abortions that your group is about.

    Pro-infantcide? Damn, I don't think Rudy likes to sneak into the maternity ward with a baseball bat

  • wut an idiot,

    we would spend millions of dollars on abortions

    when we could use that money to further cancer research, or help hurrican katrina victims!

  • Personally i think we need to have the National Health service, im glad we have it in the UK, Im not just talking about abortions but all sorts of operations, because how would you like it if you became ill for example and you either didnt have ensurance or it didn't cover it and if you were treated it would be ok but if you wasn't it would be life threatening.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more