http://davechampionshow.com | Dave Champion discusses how 14th Amendment citizens from a legal position, not a moral position, do not have the right to keep and bear arms as does the original class of citizen.
Its possible that the freed slaves didn't have inalienable rights, but that only applied to them. Their American-born decendents do have them because they are not only full-fledged citizens, but they are actually natural born citizens. But this may apply to naturalized citizens.
Of all states, how could MA not guarantee the right to bear arms? One of the reasons behind the 2nd Amendment was the battles of Lexington and Concord. MA is a state of insanity.
McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010), was a landmark[1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined whether the Second Amendment applies to the individual states. The Court held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states.
You canot go higher than Supreme Court of the United States...Mass overruled.
those law makers got their own armed body guards that's why they don't care if people can own fire arms or not. Still banning guns people can still go to mexico and get them from the drug cartels or local gangs. Then come back to America to commit crimes. Easy... Also criminals support gun bans so they can do their job easier..
Massachusetts. My home and native state. I love it here, however, the Commonwealth is bordering on socialism when it comes to gun laws/rights. The State Supreme Courts' decision is ludicrous. Carry on the torch of freedom Dave.
Its possible that the freed slaves didn't have inalienable rights, but that only applied to them. Their American-born decendents do have them because they are not only full-fledged citizens, but they are actually natural born citizens. But this may apply to naturalized citizens.
NoGuff 1 month ago
Of all states, how could MA not guarantee the right to bear arms? One of the reasons behind the 2nd Amendment was the battles of Lexington and Concord. MA is a state of insanity.
NoGuff 1 month ago
McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025, 130 S.Ct. 3020 (2010), was a landmark[1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined whether the Second Amendment applies to the individual states. The Court held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states.
You canot go higher than Supreme Court of the United States...Mass overruled.
rpur441044 3 months ago
@stephenabm you got that right. i myself am getting out of there
lrebelo100 4 months ago
The Peoples Republic of Taxachusetts is anti freedom - glad I no longer live there. It truly is a commie state...
stephenabm 8 months ago
@TheASEmaster I also like to call it Assachusetts
schnips074 1 year ago
Taxachusetts
TheASEmaster 1 year ago
Massachusetts........more like Dumbassachusetts
lrebelo100 1 year ago
those law makers got their own armed body guards that's why they don't care if people can own fire arms or not. Still banning guns people can still go to mexico and get them from the drug cartels or local gangs. Then come back to America to commit crimes. Easy... Also criminals support gun bans so they can do their job easier..
Vietboy1st 1 year ago
Massachusetts. My home and native state. I love it here, however, the Commonwealth is bordering on socialism when it comes to gun laws/rights. The State Supreme Courts' decision is ludicrous. Carry on the torch of freedom Dave.
mwells2683 1 year ago 2