Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Molten Iron FLOWING LIKE LAVA debunking the debunkers

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,363
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 29, 2009

Debunkers often say there was no motlen steel and that has been debunked .
well try telling these firefighters and scientists . also it seems that nasa must not had gotten the memo that nist sent them .

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @ctyankeestxvi , you mean the energy that turned the buildings to dust? All that was left was Steel beams? You mean that energy? Man, that is something, it can turn all 3 towers into dust and still leave molten metal in the basements....that is some kind of story. Though, it's not very believable, no way can 3 collapses all turn everything except the steel beams into dust while leaving molten metal pools months after the collapses. IMPOSSIBLE.

  • most everything in those building was fire proof .. paper is not of course .but like it or not you are also a conspiracy theorist.

    You will never be emberrassed because people who defend the official story refuse reality and basic pysics .

    you have no shame just distain for justice .

see all

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I am not saying a nuke blast is not true but why are the electronics still working wouldn't they be affected by e.m.p of a nuke ?

  • @loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.

    here is a video of the clean up crew /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0 at :35 he said he saw 14 floors piled up into 8 feet.

    if there were explosives they would have blew apart the steel support and the floors would have still pancaked, but the people in the stairwell would have (been dead by the explosives) reported hearing boom collapse on every floor but all they heard was collapse.

    how did the planes avoid setting off the explosives upon impact?

  • @occision miscomunication is a big part of why people think inside job, people said "it sounded like a bomb" the only 2 explosions that were ever identified were when the 2 planes crashed, some people may have heard an elevator hit the bottom of its shaft and that could sound like an explosion. you should check out the video series "miracle in stairwell B" 14 people survived inside the collapsing no. tower, they said they heard floors hitting one another.

    cont next post.

  • @loosechangeexposed ...a pancake with no pancakes hmmmm .. I could hear a motor cycle drive by my house and think its a truck . hearing a building being blown up or bombs going off could easily be rationalized as hearing floors collapse ..accept theres one problem ...there was no floors collapsing . at the end of the collapse what was left at the top ...nothing ..the same nothing that didnt pancake . ..

    they are not liars . some said bombs went off are they lying .

  • @occision he said he heard the pancake effect happening, a few of them said they heard it happening and you say there was no pancake effect so you are calling witnesses who were inside the stairwell of the collapsing tower liars, how could many people in the same place mistake the pancake effect when they experenced it?

    like i said even if explosives were used to take down the towers they would have destroyed the core columns and the pancake effect still would have happened. so yes it happened.

  • prison is the only place for traitors, and criminals.

  • @loosechangeexposed he's not lying , just trying to rationalize what had happen to the building .

  • @occision WTC 7 had way less structural damage then the towers, the energy of the collapses went thru the lower levels of 7, over time the fires weakened the structure and when it could no longer support the weight of 47 floors it collapsed. /watch?v=_7rj5UQvlWw

    as for the pancake effect i heard that from witnesses who survived inside the no. tower as it collapsed here is their story /watch?v=K5cvO0uEYhM prove they lied.

  • @loosechangeexposed is that also what happened to wtc 7 .. It is you that refuses reality and accepts a story given to you by the very people responsible for crime. demolition of 3 buildings in broad daylight . the floors cannot be turned to dust and crush the lower floors . besides there are no falling floors . all the destruction is outward not downward . . there are no pancaking floors at all . none .

  • @occision your comment shows that you can not grasp what happened and also shows that you make anyone who disagrees with you look like they are saying something they are not.

    every floor were equally strong buy when the collapse happened the weight from above was too much for the floor that the weight fell upon to support that weight so the way the towers collapsed was 1 floor at a time, my video "how the towers fell" explains the collapses.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more