Ron Paul at the Value Voters Debate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
42,980
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 17, 2007

Ron Paul's closing statement at the Value Voters debate.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • RON PAUL FOR FUCKING PRESIDENT!!! our country would do amazing with him running it.

  • Right on. VOTE RON PAUL! I can't believe people booed him.

see all

All Comments (781)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All vote for Ron Paul! The only hope to get this country back in fucking order!

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain

    free market? more like excessive government regulations.

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain Switzerland has a limited government: top federal income tax rate of 11.5% and 8.5% for corporations. Most swiss citizens ignore the name of their national "leaders", as the federal council has limited powers and is not partisan. Local and cantonal administrations are responsible of 2/3 of revenues and spending, compared with 1/3 in America.

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain

    Nope, don't need to make such a decision, so I won't. I'd choose a WHITE country over a black one any day, and that's the real issue. Detroit's in bad shape because it's 80 percent black.

  • Right. But there is no denying it has very limited government. Is that what we should go for?

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain Somalia has no civil society at all. It´s pretty artificial country, like so many others in Africa.

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain "Smaller government," when spoken by a typical lying republican is indeed just a buzzword to fool the sheeple into voting for them again. Just like democrats who pretend to care about the poor, then continue to bail out banks and start wars.

    Ron Paul is not a typical lying politician. He actually means what he says. Believe me, the 1% are more afraid of Ron Paul than any crowd of protesters you can assemble. Why? He will destroy the very heart of their Operation-the Fed

  • yeah lets go back to the first 100 years of the US. Only male, white landowners having a say in government.

    Nothing is perfect, but there is NO DISPUTE that today's government is better than that was

    The problem is not that the governemnt is too big, but that the people that it truly serves is too small, namely the richest 1%

    "Smaller government" is a buzz word for even less interference by the people's representatives in the top 1%'s business of pillaging this country

  • @UseYerEFFINBrain "False Dilemma." Look it up. There are more than TWO choices in this vast universe. America had "limited government" for the first hundred years of its existence, but it was NOT "Somalia." Was it perfect? No, but it isn't now either.

    Somalia does NOT have a "limited government." What it has is a whole bunch of little "governments" (aka gangs and warlords) competing to become THE government.

  • ok, decide NOW. either you go live in one of the poorest areas in America (Detroit), or in one of the poorest areas of Somalia.

    Choose now: worst part of a large government country (USA) or worse part of a limited government country (Somalia).

    I didn't think so. go back to sleep

    Another thought: Why is Detroit in such bad shape? Because of bureaucracy? Or because of the free market causing all the Auto Industries to move Detroit's jobs to Mexico and China?

    Didn't think so. Go back to sleep

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more