Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

UN marks 60 years of peacekeeping - 29 May 08

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,600
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 29, 2008

Al Jazeera's Ghida Fakry speaks to Jean-Marie Guehenno, the Under Secretary General for United Nations peacekeeping on whether the UN should take a more aggressive role in enforcing peace.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • to be honest, i don't beleive that the UN is making any difference in the world.

  • What did the UN do to stop Rwanda?

see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Jordonification You NOOB, Haiti is a case of natural disaster. Any country with influence would have help Haiti out.

    Just because you see the media covering crap about the UN doesn't mean it's true and shit.

    The UN is a mere organization that has no influence what so ever on peacekeeping or peacemaking.

    Humanitarian Aid is a different field, don't compare them. Capish?

  • @Polargoo how about Haiti n00b.

  • im sorry but i think many of you are wrong in saying the UN is useless and not making a difference, simply because of the fact your using the internet means youve got a computer and your speaking english. which means you likely in a country or area with good resource and communication, so it makes perfect sense that 'you' dont notice the difference but im sure their are many unheard thankful opinions.

  • i agree, the irish are always too drunk to do any good.

  • Irish should withdraw from UN missions.

  • the last time the UN did a good job was the korean war and to all the idiots out there it was a UN operation (look it up)

  • There is also a belief in the world today that countries that contribute PK don't have the stomach for casualties (belgiums in rwanda

    1994, US in somalia 1993, UN in 2006 israeli/lebanon war). Once these countries withdraw their forces the mission collapsed.

    PK operations are also taking place in conflicts zones that are less centralized and thus are harder to control. The 1st PK mission was b/w prof. armies, now they include militias, terrorists, pro-gov, anti-gov, and everything in between.

  • From a soldier's and commander's POV, UN peacekeeping missions are rather haphazardous. More CF personal were killed in PK operations than in Afghanistan. Rules of engagement prevent the forces the freedom to respond to conditions and prevent situations from getting out of hand.

  • The idea of Peacekeeping today is very much flawed. It's a romanticized idealogy (at least in Canada) which has it's footprint in a much different world than todays. There are never enough troops or money to support operations, too much beauracratic control from people who don't realize what's actually taking place, and often prevented from being effective in the endless conflicts of interest that come about when you get the world's nations competiting against each other. ex China vetoing Dafur.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more