Evolution not Observed ?
Top Comments
All Comments (273)
-
@Splashstorm04 Yes you are right, I have absolutely nothing to say about your comment. There is just not enough space here to express my utter dismay at your ridiculousness. It's not my problem though, like I said. And certainly not my responsibility to enlighten you. You're happy so who cares? You're not from my country "thank God", it's America that you guys are sending down the plug hole, while the rest of the world learns, develops, moves forward and becomes more advanced! Good luck!
-
@tool2342 It amuses me how you don't have anything to say about what I just said to you, so instead you try to insult my country. Nice one, Tool.
-
@Splashstorm04 You know what. I take it you are American, so I really do not care what you think or teach your kids, if you were English it would bother me. Fact is the world is very competitive and economy in the west is fucked, we Brits could do with less competition for jobs in the areas of Science and research, so go ahead and preach on about your fantasies, I actively encourage it, but see where it gets America... Good luck saving your empire, say 'hi' to China as it tramples all over you!
-
@sdfsdf666 It does!
-
@HapiFeet7 Yes, but it proves that the dog did not take that long to develop because one of the theories of dog domestication was that they were selectively bred (in a similar fashion to what occurred here) but scientists claim it took thousands and thousands of years to get dogs to act tame, in which case this experiment has proved them completely wrong. You must wonder.. what else are scientists wrong about, hmm?
-
@HapiFeet7 exactly my point!
@Turbo617 the only difference is either we choose the traits to be passed down to the next generation, or nature does. what might be useful to the species in nature, it not necessarily what will be useful for us. But the process is still the same.
jeremalaria 8 months ago 4
That being said, this particular experiment as a study of evolution is in opposition as the theory of evolution depends heavily on the idea of advancement or gain within a species, and this example presents an antithesis. Furthermore, it also clearly exhibits that an intelligent, organized, and thought filled entity was vital in the creation process, (since such anomaly do not naturally occur) which supports "religious" ideologies far more than "natural selection" or "mico-evolution".
HapiFeet7 3 months ago