Smokers Rights

Jesse speaks out on behalf of smokers and eloquently defends their right to smoke. "Smokers' Rights" was written by Jesse Goldberg abd Bill Flowerree and sung by Jesse Goldberg.

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Jesse
• Goldberg
• smoker
• cigarette
• voice
• animation
• CrazyTalk
• cancer
• lung
• throat
• nonsmoking
• cigar

[LindaDooWop]

How about banning "UGLY IN PUBLIC" next, or even better, "STUPID IN PUBLIC"! We holier than thou reformers could really have a field day!

[HerBunk]

@LindaDooWop Second hand ugliness will not harm you second hand stupidity can be contagious but second hand smoke can kill you. Thanks for your interest.

[Godzie1]

I agree w/you 100%. Hey todays 4th of July. Maybe they should ban Firework's displays. Too much sulpher..It's unhealthy. cough..cough...Yeah this sounds as stupid & ignorent as the non-smoking nazi's!

[TheOrganiston9th]

Good for you - you stopped. Now comes the self-righteous anti-smoking rhetoric. The problem with your "people who smoke crack" stance is, tobacco products are legal; crack ain't. Hence your logic is hereby crushed out in the nearest ashtray. Enjoy your pink lungs, and remember this: you quit smoking. You did NOT suddenly become better than people who still smoke. There's nothing worse than a holier-than-thou anti-smoker, except the ever-so-cute yuppie law against smoking in a bar. Cheeriaux.

[TheOrganiston9th]

@KripDrip In reply to your brilliant, pithy comment I shall endeavor to achieve the same level of intellectual content: NYA-NYA nuh NYA-NAHHHHH!!!!

[problem49]

By all means satisfy your revolting addiction, but don t accuse me of being intolerant because I refuse to share it with you. As far as Im concerned you can put as much of that shit into your body as you please, as long as you respect my right to not inhale tobacco smoke.

[leatheredgeinface]

@HerBunk You got second-hand stupidity.

Also, you missed the part of the study on second-hand smoke that said the evidence was "inconclusive." Unless you're trapped in a box for fifty years covered in cigarette smoke... You're fine. Do-gooder.

[logik316]

@LindaDooWop

Horse hockey.

Not all forms of discrimination are illegal, or wrong. People cannot choose their ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or handicap; and religious freedom is a Constitutionally protected right. But smokers are judged purely by their offensive actions and voluntary choices, and being a smoker *never* had any legally protected status in the US.

[logik316]

@LindaDooWop

Nice quote about Prohibition, except it's irrelevant here because there's a big difference in the ways alcohol and tobacco are used, and nobody's planning to actually abolish tobacco anyway. A person can drink responsibly without bothering anybody else. But a smoker is like a drinker who forces some of his booze down the throats of all the people around him. At least the drinkers don't force others to share in their drug habit.

[logik316]

@LindaDooWop

You've got it backwards. It's the non-smokers who for many years have been patiently accommodating your filthy drug habit. Now that we're in the majority, we no longer need to. Where does it stop? Who knows, but the government could outright ban tobacco products if it wants to. Smoking isn't protected in any way by the Constitution, so there's no such thing as "smokers rights".

[SRMeadows]

Smokers are just stupid people, plain and simple. They have no respect for themselves, and surely no respect for others when they light up.

Only a moron would spend so much money for the "right" to smell like s h i t.

[LindaDooWop]

@younghoss

Nobody was forcing you to go to the smoking places, just as we were never forced to go to the non-smoking places. But the anti militants weren't satisfied with that either. Now it's outside too? C'mon, we kept accommodating you people, so where does it stop?