Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Flight 93 Crash Scene Investigators Cannot Find A Large Boeing 757

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,474
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 29, 2011

Very rare local news raw video of the 'Flight 93 crash scene' investigation and evidence collection operations in Shanksville. Thanks to pumpitout.com. No plane here, gentlemen, lets pack it up and get out of these yellow suits ...... The key evidence that the official story of Flight 93 is a complete lie is the missing Boeing 757 at the "crash site" in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A Boeing 757-200 weighs +120,000 lbs (+54,000 kg) empty, has a length of 155 ft 3 in (47.3 m), wingspan of 124 ft 10 in (38 m) and a tail height of 44 ft 6 in (13.6 m). All of the eyewitnesses to the crash scene, which included firemen, were amazed that there was no evidence of the plane. There was a lot of small debris and paper, but 120,000 lbs of aircraft apparently disappeared. According to the official story, the one-time open pit mine had been filled with soft dirt which "liquefied" when the plane hit. The entire plane buried itself deeply in the ground. However, note the imprint of the tail. It is not very deep and there is no evidence of any debris from the tail.

The second key piece of evidence is the shape of the impact crater, or the crash imprint. The official story is that the 757 was at an extremely low altitude (less than 500 feet or 150 meters), the plane rolled onto its back and crashed at +500 mph (800 kmh). The crash imprint shows a vertical, or nearly vertical, impact. It is impossible for a 757 to change from horizontal flight a to vertical dive within a few hundred vertical feet -- particularly when its at twice its' design speed for low altitude. Further, the all-electronic control systems of Boeing 757s have pre-set software limits that prevents pilots from making dangerous maneuvers: such as inverted flight or vertical dives. The crash imprint and lack of debris and fire damage outside the crater could only have been caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash. And this was not possible.

The third item evidence is the circular crater. Note that it is off-center of the tail imprint. If this crater were caused by the fuselage, it should be directly under the tail imprint. If the plane crashed at an angle, with one wing striking before the other, the crater could be off-center -- however, the tail imprint would be larger. The circular crater is indicative of a below ground explosion.

The fourth piece of evidence is the grass and weeds growing in the areas where the "wing tips" and "tail assembly" imprinted the ground. Grass and vegetation is also seen growing on the sides of the burning crater walls! This grass must be the same as the PentaLawn grass, which is able to grow back within immediately after plane crashes. Clearly, the crash crater was made before 9/11 -- long enough for grass to grow.

The fifth piece of evidence that the official government story is a lie is the lack of fire damage. A Boeing 757 has a fuel capacity of 11,489 gal (43,490 l). Flight 93 was full for its planned cross country trip to California and would have had more than 9,000 gal (34,000 l) when it crashed. To put this inperspective, this amount of fuel would fill 500 automobiles. There is almost no fire damage outside the crash crater and that is only in the nearby woods.

The sixth item of evidence is the picture taken moments after the crash which shows a relatively small mushroom cloud of smoke with a narrow base. There is no extended smoke base which would be typical of aircraft crash. It is indicative of high explosive.

The government asserts that Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 AM. A seismic recording station recorded a major event at 10:06 AM. Seismic recordings are calibrated by atomic clocks which are incredibly accurate. Cleveland Air Traffic Control also had the flight on its radar at 10:06 AM. Again, the government story contradicts physical evidence. While this does not provide any proof that Flight 93 did not crash, it does illustrate government complicity.

To summarize, the physical evidence does not show that a Boeing 757-200 crashed at Shanksville: • Amount of debris not consistent with a +120,000 lb aircraft

• Crash imprint could only be caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash, which was not possible

• Circular crater indicative of a below ground explosion

• Grass and weeds are growing in the crater which clearly indicates the crater was made before 9/11 • Lack of fire damage

• Mushroom cloud not consistent with 9,000 gallons of fuel exploding and burning

• The three minute discrepancy

• Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: None.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (IranContraScumDid911)

  • Say what? come again? To answere your question(s), the terrorists didn't rewrite the constitution, but, yes, they are using taxpayer money to rebuild their country after we retialiated for Sept. 11, 2001. It's the American way nowadays, I guess, to use our money to rebuild after we bomb the living snot outa another country for attacking us. We are kinda messed up that way. It's our politicians we have to thank for that. BUT I AM STILL DAMN PROUD TO CALL MYSELF AN AMERICAN!

  • @MydogTobes Its the American way nowadays .... our founding fathers warned against you and your apathy for unlawful anti-Constitutional attacks based on a passing caveman without evidence ever presented. You are feeling all the consequences. Pakistan burned your flag on 9/12, China reverse engineered your plane in May 2001. Your enemies quickly became your best friends. Treason and all your mopney is gone. I can prove with 400 year never disproven science you are miserably wrong.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 I am miserably wrong about what? which part? Being an American? I will not apologise for being born or being born this way. It is who I am. As for the terrorists on 9-11-2001...Their koran teaches them that their god wants them to sacrifice themselves for him or sacrifice themselves themselves in his name..Any god who wants that kind of sacrifice outa his children is no god at all. God don't do that. My God wouldn't ask that of his children.

  • @MydogTobes Im am also American. You should knopw American history and what you pledged you allegiance to .... American. Who cares what you are, that does not change the facts. A plane did not crash in the field in this video, the second law of thermodynamics and the laws of motion unified confirm the evidence is so improbable we can call it impossible in your numbers. What evidence do you have that could not be planted that there were any Koran preaching cavemen on Flight 93?

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ikt123 Go to the NY Times website and look up old issues, try thye Sunday before 9/11. I have hundreds of news clips here on YT that are from before 9/11, many the days and hours before. The Fed had cut the interest rates every month for a year before 9/11 attempting to heat market. The economy was faltering, I have history as evidence, plus lots of videos on subject. The Constitution was rewritten post-9/11, its a fact. Physics proves the WTC were demolished, and you are ignorant.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 I like how you can make all that up without a shred of evidence.

  • @MydogTobes The economy was tanking, you need to get your facts straight. I have plenty of news videos from before 9/11 that say you are wrong. The Pentagon needed a new mission after the cold war was over, Bin Laden was a blessing. There were no terrorists, the towers were demolished, the Pentagon was demolished, and there was a crater too small for a plane with no wreckage in Pennsyvania. Did the terrorists rewrite the Constitution and use taxpayer cash to rebuild the Middle East?

  • @ikt123 Yeah..Tell me about it. The terrorists achieved one objective out of three known objectives. They wanted to ruin our economy (which they did in abundance). (Bill Clinton had a surplused budget). They wanted to ruin our communications with our Armies (Pentagone) and they wanted to ruin our government by hitting the white house...Ultimatley, all they managed to do was piss us off.

  • @MydogTobes It seems like there isn't any video, all we have is dead bodies, a missing plane, the dead bodies correlating with those listed on the plane that crashed, a group of saudi's with an extremely strong motive, a group of saudi's who took ownership of the attacks, and a whole lot of mess.

  • @ikt123 I don't doubt that the WTC's were hit...There is way too much video to argue that...BUT where is ANY video of the plane hitting the Pentagone? You can NOT possibly expect me to believe that in the Capitol of the U.S. that there wasn't a security camera or bunch of Japanese tourists with cameras or a red-light camera somewhere AT ALL that woulda cought that one coming in...I don't expect to see video out in Shanksville, PA...I live near there. It's a hick-town...lol.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more