Science of the Bible: Biogenesis
Uploader Comments (theTRUTHgroup)
Top Comments
-
Science is not evil.
It was created by God.
The only evil thing here is your false religious belief in slime to man evolution.
All Comments (492)
-
no evidence for spontaneous generation occurring naturally in nature in all of history. There is no evidence for one animal gaining genetic information through beneficial mutations. There is no evidence for evolution at all, except for in the imagination. Spontaneous generation and abiogenesis are the same thing just different speeds. Neither are possible in nature
-
@koolkranny There's an infinite number of ways that the universe could be completed. Say you have a universe created in the most basic way possible. That universe continues to only have one life form. that life form develops a subconcious, the subconcious generates other quantum realities with other ways that the universe started. those realities spawn living organisms and then spawn more universes. everything's happening all the time, and at the same time.
-
@MrPrior69 Another thing. Non living things are very very very patient. in fact they're so patient that they had hundreds of millions of years of random combination generation on a planet with water on it. Now i'm fairly sure that i cant live hundreds of millions of years to conduct an experiment on the generation of life. And i'm doubly sure that creating a completely enclosed environment for my water over all that timespan is equally impossible with current technology.
-
The theory of evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis. And yes there is evidence for abiogenesis. And if you're not willing to look it up for yourself, then I'm sorry, that's not really our problem.
-
@riseofatheism of course there's no proof for Abiogenesis, except your Theory of evolution. Produce proof and I might be more willing to listen you.
-
"Science" of the bible ??
"Evolutionary Big-Bang".
Daniel, you are too dumb to be dangerous.
-
Do you believe that life is made of non-life? If life is made of non-life, is it possible that any one simple life, givin all the past time, could have been assembled from non-life? If life is not made of non-life, what is life made of?
-
Pasture proved live does not ' spontaneously generate'' which has nothing to do with Abiogenesis or how live started on the earth.
-
This video is misleading and a misrepresentation of the truth. Fin.
-
So... cosmology disproves biology?
Just once I would like a theist to talk about biological evolution without the erroneous comparison with cosmology. Is any but the most foolish convinced by this?
Good job using an outdated scientific source. The Miller-Urey experiment proves you wrong. Evolution is a fact. Abiogenesis is something completely different. Evolution happened. You may wish to believe god started it, but why? We have a good understanding of how it started. And the Big Bang, Evolution, Abiogenesis, and the beginning of the universe are all SEPERATE CONCEPTS. Stop muddling them into one thing.
riseofatheism 2 years ago
Miller-Urey?
Are you kidding?
Who exactly are you accusing of using outdated sources?
theTRUTHgroup 2 years ago
The TRUTH group! INDEED!!!!!!
This is actually frightening, and worrying.
The way they sound so sure of the things they espouse.
Whatever happened to EDUCATION???
Science is so evil, that I'll drive around in a car, use a mobile phone, a camcorder, computer, and when I get ill, I've got SO much faith the first thing I do is dash off to the doctors, for some of that scientific modern medicine.
Gross hypocrisy springs to mind.
OHHH, sorry, I forgot all THOSE things aren't science are they???
martiangrundy 2 years ago
All of those things are what we like to call 'science'.
But, if you believe that we evolved from sludge, that's not science, it's religion and it's STUPID!
theTRUTHgroup 2 years ago 3