The Resurrection of Jesus - Dr. William Lane Craig

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,112
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 11, 2008

This video is from a debate Dr. William Lane Craig had with Dr. Jamal Badawi.

Check www.leestrobel.com for hundreds of excellent FREE Christian videos.

Todd Tyszka
www.toddtyszka.com



the resurrection of Jesus Dr. william lane craig Dr. Jamal Badawi debate debates debated debating islam islamic allah muslim muslims mohammad muhammad qur'an qu'ran koran quran conception of god claim claims teaching teachings diety God Hashem Jesus Christ Messiah Messianic apologist apologetic apologetics atheist atheists agnostic skeptic Bible Biblical Scripture Scriptures Gospel Gospels lee strobel resurrected resurrection

  • likes, 26 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Videos4USArmy Because they didnt resurrect.Only Jesus did.You are getting false information from Zeitgeist.

  • Great, let's move on to study the miracles of Sathya Sai Baba

  • why not talk about the resurrections of Dionysus, krishna, mithra, Osiris, or horus?

  • This is just so messed up. All of his "Facts" are from the Bible. All of the eyewitnesses are biblical characters whose existence, let alone voracity, are questionable. He makes his statements as if they are indisputably based on well-researched evidence and not a matter of faith. Either he is completely deluded or doesn't think faith is enough.

    Either way, this is just silly and a waste of time.

    

  • @xamot27 Well, here's the thing, that observation is false. For you must not know how much suffering there is invloved with being crucified. Do you know the immence pain he went through? Then ultimately dies.

    Just because God knew His Son would suffer on the cross, die, and resurrect doesn't make it any less of a sacrifice. The fact Jesus knew he was going to be put through all of the suffering, and still went through with it is actually more impressive!

  • @lizazoon Now what I gave to you concerning Paul goes into deeper detail, I'll share it with you if you are interested, via PM. I'll have to give you a timeline that gets into more depth. It changed an entire generation's belief on the resurrection of Jesus, as I heard from Dr. Habermas.

  • @seantaylor1334 If the gospel is evidence for itself, if you don`t need any outside evidence, then the Quran is evidence for itself too and so is the " Book of Vedas" and all other religious books.. So :, " Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves "was given to me, does that prove "Ali Baba" is true ? Besides your timetable is off by about 60 years. The first shred of the gospel dates from about 70 AD.

  • @seantaylor1334 umm...common sense, logic, laws of nature and critical thinking are the reasons why i believe no one can rise from the dead. my comment was just an observation. whats your rebuttal to that comment besides "are you serious?"

  • @xamot27 Are.... you serious? Is this why you do not believe Jesus rose from the dead???

  • @lizazoon Excuse me, do you mean there are no eyewitness accounts of Jesus rising from the dead? If so, you are sadly mistaken, for you see, the Gospel accounts clearly attest to the fact there were eyewitnesses of his Resurrection.

    I have no idea where you get this notion there were no eyewitnesses. Paul said, I give to you (the Corinthians) what was given to me. That means before Paul had it, which is dated around 4 years after Christ's death, someone gave him the information. Interesting.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more