9/11 Truth: Dr. David Griffin & David Shayler Interviewed

David Ray Griffin and David Shayler go over the deeper points of the 9/11 conspiracy in this interview with Gloria Hunniford.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9-11
• truth
• conspiracy
• september
• 11
• wtc
• world
• trade
• center
• controlled
• demolition
• MI5
• inside
• job

[Psycarne]

Bush and his administration have caused the death of one million people in Iraq. Yet this interviewer states that it is difficult to believe that they would kill three thousand?

What an absurd thing to say.

[kjack5]

Sheeplepeople are afraid their brains will explode if they try to think outside of the box.!

[Karlemids]

very true - the official theory is also just another conspiracy.

[shackle5]

in one of the towers, the top segment above the fire falls clearly at an angle. How the heck can that segment drive down the rest of the building when its falling off centre?

[Miltongarden]

@bman342 (2) However, I am sure a genius like you does not need any advice from me on how to navigate the web so I will write no more except to say Happy Reading and viewing or perhaps not! It is your choice.

[Miltongarden]

@bman342 Ah! Now I get it. So it was all tongue in cheek! Well acually, no. I am just a third class idiot. If you wish to know what the first class idiots think about the events of 9/11 you could check out such websites as architcts and engineers for 9/11 truth, pilots for 9/11 truth, scientists for 9/11 truth etc. Then there are the second class idiots, with websites such as citizens for 9/11 truth, and the makers of DVDs such as Loose Change and many others which question the official story.

[bman342]

@Miltongarden Look up 'sarcasm' in your English-to-whatever your native language is dictionary.

[Miltongarden]

@bman342 As I cant make head or tail of what you are on about I have no further comments!

[bman342]

@Miltongarden thanks for the great information. No, I had no idea that blg 7 came down on the same day, and could have sworn a couple of planes flew into it while no one was looking. Glad you and the rest of the "truther" idiots have the inside skinny on scientific facts, and are way smarter than the rest of us to know that the only explanation could have been controlled demolitions (and high-tech nuclear devices? that's a first, but then again you're a first class idiot).

[Miltongarden]

@bman342 No. The aviation feul would have burnt out very quickly and the fires would have killed about a hundred people at the most. The temperature of fire is not hot enough to melt steel - a scientific fact. Are you aware that building 7 came down on the same day and it was not even hit by a plane? The only explanation is controlled demolitions either with nano-thermite or high tech nuclear devices.

[bman342]

The interviewer hit the nail on the head. The planes being flown into the buildings were the clear acts of war. More than a thousand would have been killed just by the fire, without the buidlings collapsing. It just renders the concept of controlled demolition absolutely ridiculous.

[gregtool9]

I wish this guy just called the guy in the pink shirt a moron. How can anyone thing it was "Bush" or even his administration. Come on, no matter who is in office, the government still gets in. This is a long time planned, dark suits behind the visible government executed plan to controll our minds through fear, money and oil are secondary initiatives. Its all about MIND CONTROL, its deeper than you think