Olbermann Discusses Politicization of Terror by Bush Crime Family with John Dean

(By Heather, http://crooksandliars.com ) It looks like Tom Ridge's lastest revelations in his book have given Keith a chance to say he was correct when he did his series on the Nexus of Politics and Terror. John Dean weighs in on the criminality of what Ridge has admitted to in his book. He thinks Ridge gave himself some wiggle room since he said he only believed the terrorist threat level was being manipulated for political reasons, and did not say he knew it to be a fact.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Keith Olbermann
• John Dean
• Tom Ridge
• Countdown
• terror alerts
• politics
• crooks and liars

[katemarsh80]

Since then, at an uncertain hour,

That agony returns;

And till my ghastly tale is told,

This heart within me burns.

--THE RIME OF THE ANCIENT MARINER

George W. Bush has become Keith Olbermann's albatross. Mr. Olbermann can't avoid discussing the former president, nor can he avoid making an ignorant fool of himself when he does.

Such is the curse of small-minded hatred.

[RagingLib]

I'm sorry, since when is the breaking of the law and politicization of national security NOT news? Hmmm? Pathetic talking points really.

[walkermydawg]

Wow, so unlike the shit for brains administration I know.

[RagingLib]

Listen, YouTube is not a democracy. I'm NOT posting videos to allow right-wing, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathers any opportunity to express their moronic and intellectually deficient ideas. I am in NO way interested in any sort of dialogue with any member of the Christo-Fascist Zombie Brigade. Zero. I am one who thinks that bi-partisan discussion with conseratwats and Repiglickins is pointless, and unnecessary. For 16 years they didn't care about it, neither should we now.

[racheImaddow]

RagingLib,

Blocking?! Censoring?!

With these actions, you make your opponents' points better than they do.  I really wish my fellow liberals would learn to either tolerate or ignore opposing opinions.

Why should we set ourselves up to be the opponents of free speech?

Employing censorship makes it look as though we are wrong in our arguments and we don't want to admit it. People who are correct always press on and welcome the words of the other side.

Thanks for the video!