OJ Simpson Case - Unanswered Questions - part 1

2004 look back at the oj simpson case with geraldo rivera & mark fuhrman.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• oj
• simpson
• murder
• case
• trial
• unanswered
• questions
• nicole
• brown
• ronald
• goldman
• LA
• brentwood
• police
• geraldo
• rivera
• mark
• fuhrman
• tom
• lange
• phil
• vannatter
• johnnie
• cochran
• marcia
• clark
• chris
• darden
• lee
• bailey
• robert
• shapiro
• kato
• kaelin

[QGprincess]

hate Fox news. full of lies and propaganda.

[Cristty004]

wow the most ovious crime scene and still questioning he may not have done it :

1. bloody gloves (nicoles place, his place)

2. bloody bronco

3. his blood at the crime scene and nicole and ron's blood at His place

4. Bloody socks at his place.

and many many more evidence and witness crazy

the crime scene was umbelivable nicole stabbed and throat cut to near decapitated and rod goldman stabbed to death i remember being in the freeway seing the chase. me saying he did it!!

[NotYourAverageHero]

everytime i see long comments i get too lazy to read them lol.

[88jmct]

@LordOfTheTombs Furhman would of been ripped apart in questioning by the defense after the tapes came out if he had not plead the fifth. He also stated his reasoning for pleading was abandonment by the prosecution after the tapes. I've always been puzzled by his right to plead the fifth after he was already questioned and had perjured himself. I think it was a coward act on his part not an admission of guilt because I don't believe for a second that he tampered with the evidence.

[LordOfTheTombs]

@mjmitch33 He may not have been the lead investigator, and no, even though I'm black, I'm the last person you could expect to ever pull the race card on this kinda shit. All the fuck I'm doing is just questioning things, that's all the fuck I'm doing.

[mjmitch33]

@LordOfTheTombs He was not the lead investigator. He was one of the investigators who seen the same evidence that night as another 13 guys. The only evidence he found that was questionable was the glove at OJ's and that glove had OJ blood on it. You can act stupid and say the racist cop planted evidence but that is a joke as they planted it to match his wounds and match his clothes before they even knew what he was wearing or where he was. That is retarded as you are for buying it.

[LordOfTheTombs]

@Cristty004 What still bothers me is the lead investigator at the time pleading the 5th when asked about tampering with the evidence.

[mjmitch33]

@quinnthology31 Your theory on the video is also wrong as the videographer was not allowed to video until the socks were removed. The video had a time stamp that proved that. The defense tried to use a angle that did not show the sock to show that but when stills were looked at the socks were there. The stills were taken first, the evidence removed and then the video that was proven. Even the videographer testified to that fact. You are not very educated to the real case you watch to many videos

[mjmitch33]

@quinnthology31 there was no proof of being planted both the prosecution and the defense had theories and nether one proved anything. Just because a paid witness says something on the stand does not mean it is fact. EDTA is found in many things from dye,food,paint and many other chemicals. Fact is the edta that was found was 1/100th of the level of preserved blood. So no proof only a question of what was on OJ's hands or in the sock. None of the blood had edta levels that of preserved blood!

[quinnthology31]

@Cristty004 The sock was proven to be planted. The Defense showed that it was. On the sock was a chemical that is not naturally occurring in the body, but only found in viles of blood. I.E. the blood on the sock came from a vile of blood the police planted. The state DID NOT deny this after it was proven. There is also crime scene video footage that was taken earlier in the day and the sick is NOT THERE. Then later it is there in photographs.