the offside goal at 4:18 should have been counted. the defender and the attacker were on the same line. I think it was called offside because the attacker was wearing white, so he was seen more easily than the defender, who was behind him. any opinions?
the offside goal at 4:18 should have been counted. the defender and the attacker were on the same line. I think it was called offside because the attacker was wearing white, so he was seen more easily than the defender, who was behind him. any opinions?
kamoliko 10 months ago
@hatsoroush23 I agree
Atet8oo7 10 months ago
hich kudum az mogheiyat ha khatarnak nabud!
hatsoroush23 10 months ago