Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lomo Diana F+ with 35mm back Pics

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,028
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 11, 2010

Pictures from my Lomography Diana F+ with 35 mm back showing sprocket holes.
various different films
Music: Fado Rock (secret track)

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SkullNBone)

  • hello, i was just wondering if you could tell me, why do the photos change from rectangular to square shaped? (im very new to this)

  • @moodyclaire On the 35mm Diana F+ back, you get 4 'masks' with it, they are different sizes.

    The masks set the size of the photograph on the negative, There are four masks that come with the back. There are two square masks, one where you can see sprocket holes and one where you cannot.

    And two rectangle, one with sprocket holes, one without

  • hi there, i have just bought of these 35mm backs and had issues... in that when i went to get my pictures developed they could only develop the film and not print pictures because they were all too "wide" and had overlapped...

    what am i doing wrong? and would it have anything to do with using to fisheye (which shouldn't matter but i thought i'd ask)

    what settings do i need to have? what mask? and does it make a difference for redscale film?

  • @greenham1 you need to scan the whole negative to see the sprocket holes, and have the winder setting on the appropriate one for size. if you use the mask that covers them up it doesnt take the pic on that part and i think they can be scanned as normal.just depends if u want to see the sprocket holes or not what mask you use.

  • I have 2 questions does the 35mm back degrade the image quality and is there a way to get the little black holes off?

  • @MotortekCPMedia I wouldnt have thought so, it just depends the resoultion they are scanned. cropping or using a mask that hides them would do it. the picture is taken on the entire negative and the holes cant be 'filled in' because it is taken over the sprocket holes

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • how much do you wind the film in order to know you're in the next frame? thank you!!

  • is it possible to get these photos developed on like seperate sheets instead of just having the roll of film? so you have a seperate image on a seperate piece of photo paper?

  • when i take a picture and wind the film, do i wind it until i see the next number, or the dot which is between the numbers? (e.g. wind it, see the number 2, but stop when i see the next dot)

  • so i guess i'm asking...

    how do i get photos where i can have the sprockets and it's clear where the photo starts and ends so they can be printed at my local developers.

    hope this helps. please let me know

  • @SkullNBone thnx for the rspnse but it kind of wasn't answer i was looking for, mayb i worded my question wrong i'll try again. all your photos show the sprocket holes and the photos are nicely separated with solid lines

    when it came to my photos (bear in mind that i take my to a shop to be developed) they said that they couldn't print the photos because when doing the negatives all the photos overlapped and they couldn't tell where one photo started and stopped

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more