Leviticus Gay Abomination

Now that the Mosaic Law is ended, it is easy to imagine how faithful homosexual relationships, where a person's natural sexual orientation is given context and fulfilment in love, might be completely compatible with the New Testament "Law of liberty." But, many Christians, when they read the Mosaic Law, think that they see more than a mere prohibition against homosexuality there. They also think that the Mosaic Law demonstrates an actual hate on the part of God for homosexuality.

This video explains how they come to that conclusion, and why they are wrong.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Leviticus
• Abomination
• Bible
• Christ
• Jesus
• God
• Hell
• Gay
• Lesbian
• Homosexual
• Christianity
• Paul
• Marriage

[CreationPhotography]

Hi gayChristian

i cannot explain this with few words

do you have skype

[gaychristian]

I'm afraid that I don't have skype. Sorry.

[CreationPhotography]

im a gay christian but

i do know where the new covenant condems the homosexual act

Jude 1:7

Jud 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

and i have been in vary heated internal spiritual warfare over this one area my homosexuality  im extremely conservative biblical gay man Jude 1:7 is one i cant dismiss

[gaychristian]

I don't think that Jude 1v7 is actually about homosexuality, CreationPhotography. I think that it probably makes more sense, in the context, to refer to an attempt to have sex with angels, which is what the men of Sodom were about to do.

They were certainly abominable people - so filled with sexual lust that they were willing to rape what ever visitors came to their town - male or female, angel or human. They had certainly "given themselves over to fornication."

[gaychristian]

Could you you tell us where you got your information about concubines in the early Church, and tell us exactly what their status was? Also, is it a form of polygamy that you are referring to?

There are lots of things that aren't explicitly mentioned in the Bible as OK (or good), yet Christians, led by the Spirit of God, still see that they are beneficial.

[gaychristian]

I'm not quite sure what your point is here. Could you clarify?

I've discussed I Corin 6v9 in another video. I'm not sure what Greek word you are referring to with "impudictia" (Latin is not the language that the Bible was written in), but if you are referring to "arsenokoitai," then you'll find an explanation of what I think Paul was getting at in that video.

[gaychristian]

Thanks for your point, making it clear that Christians like me (Gentile origin) certainly aren't bound by the Law of Moses. I'm not sure about Jewish Christians. That is a difficult area. In Acts 21v17-26, there seems to be a difference placed between the Churches response to Jews and Gentiles, but I wonder if this may have been a compromise.

I think that you get a better understanding of Pauls view from verses like Romans 14v14. Paul simply wanted Christians to accept one another (Rom 15v7).

[Thorsupremecommander]

one more note.

it is true that mosaic law was abandoned by christians of pagan origin, but not christians of Jewish origin. It is very clearly seen in Acts, when Paul goes to Jerusalem called Paul undergoes all cleaning rites and clearly states that he did not abandon Moses law.

so as far as christians of pagan origin are concerned they are not bound by moses law

[Thorsupremecommander]

this is interesting argumentation but has one major flaw in my opinion. it is true that uncleanness of food and body has been abandoned in new covenant. however with out exception: Romans 1,23-27. uncleanness (akatharsia) here is clearly defined in context of homosexuality. It is then repeated out of this pagan rites context 1 Corr 6,9 and 1 Corr 12,21. world impudictia meant sexual male passive role especially homosexuality

What about these verses?

[Thorsupremecommander]

actually in this particular case it could work for homosexual marriages. you know, we spoke on my channel about concubines. these women were sometimes a breeders, sorry for the word, I don't know how to express in english a "replacable" woman who brings children for infertile familiy.

there is greater problem with homomarriage. it has been never mentioned by God in the Bible as mean of sanctification for homosexual relations