Fujifilm HS10 high speed 1000FPS
Loading...
22,621
Loading...
Uploader Comments (performante1)
see all
All Comments (16)
-
why you guys says it's fake, the fuji film hs10 has hight speed of 1000fps.
you can see the spec in the webpage
-
@performante1 what's the maximum resolution you can shoot the hs10 at 1000fps at? or is it not limited by the fps?
-
@Yibidoo its not, most of high speed vids are shot in b/w for the reasons performante1 said, i just ordered mine hope to have it soon :D
-
not 1000fps
-
Looks real to me.
-
OMG WOW!
-
Nice, I'm going to buy this APN very soon...
Loading...
this is fake!!
Yibidoo 1 year ago
@Yibidoo dear friend, i can explain why you might think this video could be a fake, but i can explain.
The quality is in fact better for this video (only) because of the very low compression needed because 90% of this video is BLACK. so the very few pixels that are left, do not need much compression.
in essence: the more the different colors in the image, the more compression is needed to maintain filesize, and the worse the quality.
The oposite is true for the the inverse.
performante1 1 year ago 6
i don't beliebve that. This is a fraud! The 480fps videos have a worse quality than this. So why should the 1000fps video have a better quality? My guess is that this vid is a product of fuji advertising by telling us a lie about the quality of their cameras which are supposed to make vids like on this page...
Be4t1e 1 year ago
@Be4t1e dear friend, i can explain why you might think this video could be a fake, but i can explain.
The quality is in fact better for this video (only) because of the very low compression needed because 90% of this video is BLACK. so the very few pixels that are left, do not need much compression.
in essence: the more the different colors in the image, the more compression is needed to maintain filesize, and the worse the quality.
The oposite is true for the the inverse.
performante1 1 year ago
Hi,
What is the original size of the video ?
(I thought only 64 pix wide ?)
sweillerYT 1 year ago
@sweillerYT no, it's 224 wide by 64 tall.
performante1 1 year ago