Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Has history been tampered with? The Mongolian Horde was merely the Russian army

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,583
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 17, 2006

Has history been tampered with? According to the official version of history, Russia remained under the political and military yoke of the Mongols for many centuries on end.
The term "Mongol" is usually assumed to have always meant the same thing - however, this turns out to be incorrect. Bear in mind that Mongolia didn't exist as an independent state until the early 20th century! The word "Mongol" simply meant "Great One" - its association with the nomadic tribes hailing from the steppes north of China is a later invention...There was no such thing as the Tartar and Mongol invasion followed by two centuries of slavery. The so-called "Tartars and Mongols" were the actual ancestors of the modern Russians, living in a bilingual state with Arabic spoken as freely as Russian. The ancient Russian state was governed by a double structure of civil and military authorities. The hordes were actually professional armies with a tradition of lifelong conscription (the recruitment being the so-called "blood tax"). Their "invasions" were punitive operations against the regions that attempted tax evasion. Russian history as we know it today is a blatant forgery concocted by a host of German scientists brought to Russia by the usurper dynasty of the Romanovs.

But why did Horde have to be invented?

The reason is simple - the actual "Mongol conquerors of Russia" never existed. The yoke theory was created by the German court historians of the new Russian dynasty - the Romanovs. It has served the end of justifying the Romanovs' claims for the throne and demonising their longtime adversaries - the Horde, or the professional Russian army, which remained fiercely loyal to the old Russian dynasty. The savage Mongol and Tartar invaders and torturers of the Russian land that we read about in history textbooks were the protectors of the state in reality - and ethnic Slavs for the most part. Small wonder historians still cannot find a single trace of the mythical Mongol capital - no such capital ever existed anywhere near the Gobi Desert.

The Mongol Horde identified as the Russian army are extremely hard to swallow for any Russian - yet they are just the tip of the iceberg called New Chronology, which is a radical reconstruction of world history in general and a brainchild of Anatoly Fomenko, one of today's leading mathematicians.

"History: Fiction or Science?" - Challenge to traditional history.

Is it possible that Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented during Renaissance? Can it be that Jesus Christ was born in 1053 AD and crucified in 1086 AD? Scientific research points to the evidence that many modern beliefs of traditional history are a sham.

"History: Fiction or Science?" by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues crowns 30 years of meticulous and extensive research. It is the first volume in seven comprising a "Chronology" that exposes numerous questionable notions of traditional history.

"History: Fiction or Science?" describes how the contemporary chronological scale was created and by whom, with the culprits named as the 16th 17th century clergy. The well-known model of history has enjoyed the relentless attention of prominent critics ever since its creation including respected people like Sir Isaac Newton and Jean Hardouin, the court librarian of Louis XIV, the Sun King of France.

Anatoly Fomenko dissects every historical age scrupulously and analyzes the data from every angle imaginable. Roman and Egyptian chronology take a good beating. Poggio Bracciolini and Petrarch take the blame for creating the beautiful legend of a mythical Classical age that never was.

The Biblical events are brought a lot closer to us both historically and geographically. The Biblical Jerusalem is actually the medieval city of Constantinople. The New and the Old Testament swap their positions in chronological order and are shown to refer to medieval events.

Using astronomy and statistics to back his theories, Fomenko delivers an abundant astronomical proof showing that the identified dates of 'ancient' eclipses are blatantly untrue. Fomenko explains the confusion between the Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and how the division between the two is merely imaginary. The book contains in-depth descriptions of the research methods used as well as the most meticulous rendition of the global chronological map with its numerous errors and glitches explained in a very level-headed manner. One doesn't have to be a mathematician to comprehend Fomenko's presentation.

"History: Fiction or Science?" transforms history from fiction into a rocket science. It is a must read for everyone who isn't entirely indifferent to human history and possibly also for those who are.

  • likes, 69 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mithec)

  • This is crazy

  • different accounts of the same historical events are often 'assigned' different dates and locations by historians and translators, creating multiple "phantom copies" of these events; these "phantom copies" are often misdated by centuries or even millennia and end up incorporated into conventional chronology;

  • And I should throw away wikipedia, teachings of my parents and archeological facts and listen to this stuff why?...

  • 2 x 2 = 4. that's why!

Top Comments

  • You can twist history as much as you want but you can never twist genetics

    Mongolians and siberians like buryats,oroqen,evens evenkss,carry highest frequencies of haplogroup C3 in the world.Genghis khan his family tree also belonged to C3. and 1/4 of haplogroup O and 4% of Q,N.

    Kazakhstan 60%

    Hazara 66%

    Uzbeks 35%

    Tajiks 16%-24%

    Turkey 3.50%

    Turkmen 14%

    This gene can also be found from northwest europe to india.

  • this video is 6 min of bullshit.

see all

All Comments (134)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DNA cannot lie

  • @mongolANDtamerlane - yes, that'd be because they're all from Mu or LeMuria, like i said.

    if you want the info on the latter-day genes, it's mentioned in that documentary i linked you, i don't recall the name in it and it didn't show in a brief search online.

  • @JustSomePerson888

    Your 2001 study shows Native american are closer to Ainu.

    "Ainu preserved proto-Mongoloid traits"[24]. Proto-Mongoloid features can be found in most Amerindians (Native Americans), while modern Mongoloid features are an adaption to the "cold". [25] anthropologist Elsie Clews Parsons physical features of the "Proto-Mongoloid" were characterized as, "a straight-haired type, medium in complexion, jaw protrusion, nose-breadth, and inclining probably to round-headedness".[26]

  • they're related cause they are all from Mu / Lemuria, the Pacific-based lands of pre-Atlantis.

    the docu about China discovering Americas mentions genes from more recent times in the last few hundred odd years.

  • @mongolANDtamerlane

    w w w ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/115439­02

    there's another study, i don't recall the authors name, it's in this documentary,

    /watch?v=ujlqENq5S08

  • @JustSomePerson888

    Look what up? COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING with your wild claim. Show me evidence of such wild claim. Native americans belong to haplogroup Q, there is no genetic evidence.

  • @mongolANDtamerlane - look it up.

    i knew it'd be true, and there is actual genetic evidence.

    why in the hell would you find that insane? insane is the suggestion that China and many more areas weren't going to and from 'the americas' all along, there were never much of a break in contact between the land masses.

  • the problem here would be that the history isn't just coming from the west, but from many eastern sources also. clearly lots is missing, but the 'mongol empire' lasted somewhat a long time, and is considered to be the size its generally considered to be, from east and west sources. lots of lands were part of it, but left unchanged.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more