Has history been tampered with? The Mongolian Horde was merely the Russian army
Uploader Comments (mithec)
Top Comments
-
You can twist history as much as you want but you can never twist genetics
Mongolians and siberians like buryats,oroqen,evens evenkss,carry highest frequencies of haplogroup C3 in the world.Genghis khan his family tree also belonged to C3. and 1/4 of haplogroup O and 4% of Q,N.
Kazakhstan 60%
Hazara 66%
Uzbeks 35%
Tajiks 16%-24%
Turkey 3.50%
Turkmen 14%
This gene can also be found from northwest europe to india.
-
this video is 6 min of bullshit.
All Comments (134)
-
DNA cannot lie
-
@mongolANDtamerlane - yes, that'd be because they're all from Mu or LeMuria, like i said.
if you want the info on the latter-day genes, it's mentioned in that documentary i linked you, i don't recall the name in it and it didn't show in a brief search online.
-
Your 2001 study shows Native american are closer to Ainu.
"Ainu preserved proto-Mongoloid traits"[24]. Proto-Mongoloid features can be found in most Amerindians (Native Americans), while modern Mongoloid features are an adaption to the "cold". [25] anthropologist Elsie Clews Parsons physical features of the "Proto-Mongoloid" were characterized as, "a straight-haired type, medium in complexion, jaw protrusion, nose-breadth, and inclining probably to round-headedness".[26]
-
they're related cause they are all from Mu / Lemuria, the Pacific-based lands of pre-Atlantis.
the docu about China discovering Americas mentions genes from more recent times in the last few hundred odd years.
-
w w w ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/115439
02 there's another study, i don't recall the authors name, it's in this documentary,
/watch?v=ujlqENq5S08
-
Look what up? COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING with your wild claim. Show me evidence of such wild claim. Native americans belong to haplogroup Q, there is no genetic evidence.
-
@mongolANDtamerlane - look it up.
i knew it'd be true, and there is actual genetic evidence.
why in the hell would you find that insane? insane is the suggestion that China and many more areas weren't going to and from 'the americas' all along, there were never much of a break in contact between the land masses.
-
the problem here would be that the history isn't just coming from the west, but from many eastern sources also. clearly lots is missing, but the 'mongol empire' lasted somewhat a long time, and is considered to be the size its generally considered to be, from east and west sources. lots of lands were part of it, but left unchanged.
This is crazy
sebastinha 3 years ago 2
different accounts of the same historical events are often 'assigned' different dates and locations by historians and translators, creating multiple "phantom copies" of these events; these "phantom copies" are often misdated by centuries or even millennia and end up incorporated into conventional chronology;
mithec 3 years ago 2
And I should throw away wikipedia, teachings of my parents and archeological facts and listen to this stuff why?...
JedoDre 4 years ago 2
2 x 2 = 4. that's why!
mithec 4 years ago