No on Proposition 16

PG&E is spending $44 million to ensure their monopoly on Californias energy supply. They are running manipulative ad campaigns to try and alter our constitution. They have a dismal economic, social, and environmental record and they should not have the right to dictate how we get our energy. VOTE NO ON PROP 16

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• prop
• proposition
• black-out
• scandal
• pge
• pg&e
• pacific gas and electric
• 16
• energy
• vote
• ballot
• california
• peter darby
• taxpayer
• tax
• payers
• taxpayers right to vote act

[Starwar1970]

Is it true?  If yes then Thank your telling me.

[fpgne]

You're welcome. All the statements are facts.

[maximilian333]

it doesn't make sense except that Bakersfield is HOT and you need air conditioning to stay alive there! :) Jerks. The alternative to PG&E is wonderful green energy at fair prices as chosen by the local folks who can go to local meetings at their city or town hall to ask questions and keep people honest. All we can do is call PGE and gripe into the phone.

[paul8kangas]

Today only 327 people saw this flic exposing the thieves of PG&E.

Today PG&E spend $1 M, & sent ads to every voter in California.

Most will just read the lies, & then vote the way PG&E tells them to vote.

Unless you , yes, YOU, stand up & go ask 10 friends to vote "NO" on Prop 16 & 14.

Youtube: paul 8 kangas

[Muzzy337]

FUCK PG&E. They're scum sucking greed merchants. Fucking pigs.

[ASLforever100]

PROP 16 is dead but PGE is stilling there and power over ratepayer. Why can't I choose other friendly electric company than PGE????

[maximilian333]

PG&E tried to pull a fast one with their smart meters- ripping off grannies and regular folks whose bills mostly went up. Shame on them. VOTE NO on 16 which PG&E is using to stop us from shattering their monopoly and implementing solar & wind energy etc- remember these are the guys whose stupid pipeline just killed how many? people in San Bruno.

[tubewog]

I voted NO.

[tubewog]

Yes vote means it would make it hard for the competition to offer utilities to the public. A No-vote means business as usual giving other utility investors or competitors to offer competitive price on utilities. Competition is good for consumers like you and I. If PG&E has no competition, it means monopoly for them to offer utility services at higher price. Get it. If the YES vote prevails, the voter-citizen-consumer didn't have a clue what they voted for. PG&E just outsmarted the voters.

[hometownchico]

It's true they filed for bankruptcy, only to scam us customers. The fact is, the filling was a part of PG&E. That part was the meter reader's department, which they showed was loosing money. PG&E funneled that money away to make it look like they were loosing money. CPUC found out about it and again, like always just slapped them on the hands and said no, no and here we are. Putting finds PG&E doesn't work. They will always find away to keep it's stock holders profitable.