The stunning Apollo 10 coverup - The Music Behind The Moon

Apollo 10's amazing encounter with a VERY bizarre anomaly while behind the far side of the Moon. This segment will give you an up-close look at an astounding audio transcript from the Apollo 10 mission that has never before been publicly analyzed - and that NASA and the Apollo 10 astronauts to this day still refuse to talk about.
You will follow Tom Stafford, Gene Cernan, and John Young as they become only the second crew in history to journey behind the lunar far side. During this period of "LOS" (Loss Of Signal), the astronauts encounter something truly incredible - they discover MUSIC behind the Moon!

*THE DSE and DSEA*
Throughout the Apollo program, the CSM and LM spacecraft carried what were known as DSE and DSEA "black box" flight data recorders. These instruments recorded the internal LM and CSM crew conversations while the astronauts were around the lunar far side and out of radio contact with Earth. Although NASA has never made the actual DSE/DSEA audio recordings public, transcripts of these far side conversations are available in the NASA archives, and as you will see, they offer up some truly AMAZING surprises!

Here is a link to the Apollo 10 DSEA voice transcript (in PDF format) for those who are interested.
http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/history/mission_trans/AS10_LM.PDF

Stay tuned for Jose Escamilla's new motion picture documentary "MOON RISING", where we will go into much further depth about what is, without exaggeration, the most monumental coverup in human history. http://MoonRising-TheMovie.com. Lunacognita@gmail.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Conspiracy
• moon
• lunar
• Apollo
• shuttle
• alien
• UFO
• extraterrestrial
• ET
• hoax
• lie
• space
• military
• NASA
• aliens
• music

[Cowcharge]

I was going to suggest it was radio noise since, obviously, sound can't travel through a vacuum. And whattya know, on page 241 of the PDF: "CDR: That weird noise is on VHF B." "LMP: It's a what?" "CDR: It's on VHF B." "LMP: Is that right?" "CDR: Yes." (Yawn.)

[Cowcharge]

LOL, "obviously". Dude, if you're gonna float loony conspiracy theories, you ought to at least TRY to cloak them in some sort of professionalism, consistent with actual scientific research. You'll fool a lot more people that way.

[Cowcharge]

LOL, extrapolate much?

[flotsam417]

And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.

[MrTaylor8799]

Sounds to me like "you wont believe this THING"

[TheGreatMalefic]

To me, it sounds more "HANK" than "FRANK".... :/

[ApolloWasReal]

@Quazzga They specifically refer to window 1, which is square. None of the windows are circular.

BTW, you're still ignoring the fact that the view of the earth is consistent with their reported position and NOT with a circular cutout on the earth from LEO.

That has to be one of Sibrel's most idiotic claims to date. The guy is just contemptible.

[ApolloWasReal]

@Quazzga Every photographer knows that when you shoot into an overexposed light source, it will bloom in the image. That was especially true for old TV cameras like these. Here it happens to both the inside light and the earth, though because the camera had been backed away from window #1 the earth already filled much of that small window. It should also be obvious that the crew often blocks the view of the earth since the camera is looking across most of the crowded cockpit.

[ApolloWasReal]

@Quazzga As for 7:45, that's absolutely trivial. They moved the camera back from the window, along its line of sight to the earth, toward the middle or right seat while still looking generally at the earth through tiny window #1. Because the camera is stopped way down to see the very bright earth, only the inside fluorescent light appears with it. Then the iris is opened and we see the CM interior. Now the light and the earth both overexpose the camera. What's the big deal?

[ApolloWasReal]

@Quazzga Correction: The earlier test TV broadcast was made while the stack was in passive thermal roll, but it is stopped at 33:48, before the segment with the supposed arm. It is obvious that the camera is not up against the window, but is being held or allowed to float near it and it drifted off to the edge of the square window, specifically window #1, the small window next to the left seat. Those CM windows are pretty small; have you ever seen them?