LIBERAL?

Here is the definition. Are YOU a liberal?

Please leave a comment.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• liberal
• conservative
• George
• Bush
• John
• Kerry
• democrat
• republican
• vote
• election
• 2006
• congress

[meisema666]

Hahahaha. Yeah. no.

Democrats are definitely NOT Liberals... They're just slightly more socially Liberal than Republicans.

Liberalism itself isn't a political party. It's a way of thinking.

Nonetheless most Liberal politicians opt to label themselves as "Democrats" in order to get funding, or because of society's criminalizationof the word "Liberal".

[GeorgeP1066]

I'm quite sure that I'm a liberal but I see no evidence that the Democrats have ever been anything other than slightly less illiberal than the Republicans.

[1macboo]

“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.” ~ Greek proverb

We must cease to be selfish and we then will undersatand that we are all one. Where there is no vision, the people perish. - Proverbs 29:18

Conservatives need to see beyond today.

[gruvboy]

That would be nice if liberals were actually any of those things.

[wrjamescom]

@yellowkrux You stick to your parroted lines all you want. The rest of the world knows the actual meaning of the words and are laughing at you.

I wont evan ask what a republican narnia is supposed to be. Presumably it's something to do do with you republicrats and your fantasies.

Have fun in your cage, Polly.

[yellowkrux]

@wrjamescom Yes, I'm going to stick with the actual definition of Free Market, & I'm going to stick with knowing the actual form our government takes.

Have fun in republican narnia.

[wrjamescom]

@yellowkrux Just like you think you know what free market means, you also think you know what democracy means, and my political affiliation. You are still batting zero parroting your lines. I'll leave the usual BS to you republicrat parrots. It's actually hilarious when you parrots spout off your lines with no clue what you are talking about. Funnier still that you think your crackpot socialist scamming face is different from the other face of the two faced republicrat party.

[yellowkrux]

@wrjamescom

Again I'll stick with the actual definition of free market. Especially because you just changed yours.

& No if you followed your definitions of free market,monopolies would develop.

& Sorry but we do elect or representatives, they aren't chosen by any other means, that makes us a democratic republic.

So I think I'm just going to stick to reality, you have fun in republican narnia.

[wrjamescom]

@yellowkrux Free market means what it means without ref=gard to the lines you've learned from crackpots. A monopoly only exists out of a free market when it is forced, when no one is allowed to compete, as in the post office example. Patents are to respect property rights, enabling a free market. And you should take your own advice and learn before attempting to teach. This is not a democracy no matter what you were taught to parrot.

[yellowkrux]

@wrjamescom So a monopoly falls under your definition of free market capitalism? & How do you explain the contradiction on slavery, after all free market capitalism is" people being able to trade what ever they want", & don't monopolies prevent people from trading in such a manner? For that matter what about patented products?

I'll stick with the actual definition of free market.

& Again we are a democratic republic, the constitution set us up as such & elect the senate too. Study civics.