Monica Dennington of Tic Toc Ministries Reviewed and Called to Repent by Non-Calvinist Radio Station

Here we have a non-Calvinist radio station who found Monica Dennington's recent diatribe against Calvinism so ridiculous that they decided to review it and hold it to Scripture even though they don't agree with Calvinism. I think Chris Rosebrough did a wonderful job even though we disagree on Calvinism (I agree with Calvinism; he doesn't). If you want a good refutation of Tic Toc Ministry's video, I'm not sure if you'll find much better. While you listen to this, be sure to keep in mind that this is a *non-Calvinist* reviewing Dennington's video.

As I've pointed out earlier, here Ms. Dennington argues that arguing is wrong, presents her theological view with the intention that you agree with it that if we agree with another's theological view, we're committing idolatry, and says that division is wrong while encouraging her viewers to divide themselves from "this error of Calvinism." etc.

(This video falls under section 107 of the Fair Use Law. You can find more about it here:
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#107
If anyone has any notion that they'd like to have this removed based primarily on the claim of copyright infringement, be forewarned that I'm ready to fight it. This is clearly an example of material used for the purpose of critique which falls under section 107.)


Mrs. Dennington's original video would be linked here if Fighting for the Faith did not review the entire video from start to finish.

Here's the link to Pirate Christian Radio:
http://www.piratechristianradio.com

Fighting for the Faith:
http://www.fightingforthefaith.com

Link to the show:
http://www.fightingforthefaith.com/2009/06/what-kind-of-church-would-make-an-...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Calvin
• Calvinism
• John
• Calvinist
• Father
• idolatry
• reform
• reformation
• spurgeon
• graham
• jack
• true
• gospel
• tradition
• tic
• toc
• ministries
• monica
• dennington

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

@20485742895729875 Your problem is that you opened your mouth without sufficiently engaging your brain. You COULD HAVE AND WOULD HAVE understood my words if you had PAID ATTENTION to what I actually said instead of paying attention to your own ignorant PRESUMPTIONS.

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

@20485742895729875 You're the one with a logic problem. "Does that mean that Peter and Paul taught contrary things? No."

I NEVER suggested NOR used ANY language that any of their teachings were contrary. You need to PAY ATTENTION when you read something and not jump to ignorant and foolish conclusions. His REITERATED point was that they "taught the same thing." My point was that COULD NOT be true because Peter wouldn't be teaching something he found "hard to understand."

[20485742895729875]

@IamaFreeWillOffering You obviously need a course in logic since you can't seem to address the issues relevantly.

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

@20485742895729875 You obviously have a reading comprehension problem.

[20485742895729875]

@IamaFreeWillOffering Your response doesn't address his claim at all. Paul taught things that are hard to understand. Does that mean that Peter and Paul taught contrary things? No. P&A taught Apollos the way of God more accurately. Does that mean that between them or other apostles were alternative or contradictory doctrines? Of course not. There wasn't a Paul denomination or a Peter denomination or an Apollos denomination. And that's all he's saying here.

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

I listened again and found the other issue. It's your claim that Paul, Peter and Apollos all taught the same thing. That's TOTALLY unsubstantiated by ANY Scripture, and is clearly countered by Peter's remark about some things taught by Paul are "hard to understand." You're telling us Peter taught things he didn't understand? Nonsense. Also P&A taught Apollos the way of God "more accurately," clearly showing that men grew in knowledge then as they do now. I could say more but space is limited.

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

@ProphetessTelharesha "FULLPROOF"?

Even if you mean "foolproof," that's impossible for the natural man receives not the things of the spirit of god for they are foolishness to him and he cannot understand them for they are spiritually discerned.

Spiritual truth is not fool proof. Fools will tear apart even the Words of Jesus just as Obama did when he referenced our Lord's words to mock the idea of a nation following the Bible.

Notice he never mocked the Koran, though he claims he's Christian

[IamaFreeWillOffering]

Good response to Jeze... er, I mean Monica, but a couple of things about your teaching.

The "three things" are not "context context context" and btw, *you have no Scripture for that* (please take honest note), but is "in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every fact be established." Note this is twice in the OT and confirmed FOUR times in the New, yet conservative fundamentalists IGNORE this FOUNDATIONAL TRUTH.

I forget the other thing, but if you repent on this, you'll do well!