@rocoreb I have read only a few dozen non-cherry-picked e-mails. But there have been at least 3 reviews by commissions of the e-mails and no deliberate attempt to mislead or fabricate has been found. Also, it's telling that, close to 2 years after the leak of 12 years of emails, the best that the opponents came come up with are "hide the decline" and "kick the crap out of".
@bannor99 if you have read over 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, and reached a definitive conclusion on whether or not scientists were involved in a conspiracy to tamper with data, then my hat goes off to you sir.
@chowmein911 so you watch a one sided argument on youtube and call it pseudoscience? the consensus amoung scientists is that anthropogenic climate change is real and has been for a long time. the idea of carbon tax is to make people more aware of the energy they are consuming and hopefully cut down. thats not to say that some people aren't exploiting that the climate change issue. whats wrong with people that they want to believe in every single conspiracy thats suggested?
@rocoreb I have read only a few dozen non-cherry-picked e-mails. But there have been at least 3 reviews by commissions of the e-mails and no deliberate attempt to mislead or fabricate has been found. Also, it's telling that, close to 2 years after the leak of 12 years of emails, the best that the opponents came come up with are "hide the decline" and "kick the crap out of".
bannor99 6 months ago
@bannor99 if you have read over 1,000 e-mails and 3,000 documents, and reached a definitive conclusion on whether or not scientists were involved in a conspiracy to tamper with data, then my hat goes off to you sir.
rocoreb 6 months ago
@netfisherman Clearly you haven't read the e-mails. Try doing that before you tell others to do the same.
bannor99 6 months ago
@chowmein911 so you watch a one sided argument on youtube and call it pseudoscience? the consensus amoung scientists is that anthropogenic climate change is real and has been for a long time. the idea of carbon tax is to make people more aware of the energy they are consuming and hopefully cut down. thats not to say that some people aren't exploiting that the climate change issue. whats wrong with people that they want to believe in every single conspiracy thats suggested?
gavhof 7 months ago
lol flourecent light contain mercury something the government did not know how to recylce. it was actually a method to boost our economy.
BiZZiEBucKZ 1 year ago
Netfisherman, Carbon is a collective term used for the 6 main green house gases. Perhaps you should do your research again!
RedCodeRob1 1 year ago
What bullshit! Carbon is not a pollutant. Don't get taken by these con artists. Do your own research. Google "climategate" and read the emails.
netfisherman 1 year ago
Dubious. David had all of Hilary's answers before responding and showing something 'better'.
alleygh0st 1 year ago
Invest in a web cam... that excellent or u guys can help David Suzuki by instead of just listening to him, going to my channel!
xxPowerOnxx 1 year ago
I hope David meant to say Fair Trade.
qfruit 1 year ago