Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D on Poppin the Quiff 1 of 2

Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D on Poppin the Quiff

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Fred
• Alan
• Wolf
• quantum
• physics

[vol1prophet]

I love Fred Alan and what the bleep do we know is a great movie. I would love to hear and see him in a lecture.

[naneux]

Was there a big bang? or simply because matter was obserbving itself, it produced its own reason or attempt to reason or explain its own existence? Therefore, the human mind.

[music3714]

gas que gas piro vos tan aguevaos

[rosemilenio]

I love the way hi talk. I like to talk like hen.

[timewasteland]

That's really interesting, "We were born to mess with the reality". Like there is some kind of higher level of intelligence that created us like an experiment, to see if humans could reach this answer or Theory Of Everything... Maybe there are other beings out there that are created for the same thing, and the "higher power" wants to see who can "win" first. Just maybe?

[3877michael]

@doctordave You are not wrong. Studying physics you come to one view. Turn your mind in on it's self you have another view. Some people actually see angles in the architecture. Go figure. On the other hand scientific thinking may end at the observable. So how much (of reality) exists that is unobservable and can never be modeled " scientifically " ? It is true that this and many videos like this are in no way science but they may have some truth in them. Call it Jew Voodoo. ( joke)

[3877michael]

@doctordave You are not wrong. Studying physics you come to one view. Turn your mind in on it's self you have another view. Some people actually see angles in the architecture. Go figure. On the other hand scientific thinking may end at the observable. So how much (of reality) exists that is unobservable and can never be modeled " scientifically " ? It is true that this and many videos like this are in no way science but they may have some truth in them. Call it Jew Voodoo. ( joke)

[doctordave]

@HadeanAgent if you had paid any attention to my user account, you would see that i AM a theoretical physicist and I DO teach about quantum mechanics at the university level, and that my video stream in fact includes an entire lecture on just this sort of flaky misinterpretation of quantum mechanics as some kind of new-age-consciousness-we-are-o­ne-with-the-universe nonsense.So I DO know as much as he does. And if "thinking differently" means "thinking unscientifically" then no, that's not ok.

[HadeanAgent]

@doctordave Lemme put it to you this way - he actively works in the field of theoretical physics, something I can't claim to do and something I'm pretty sure I can safely assume you can't claim either. I do question his conclusions, I think we all should...and even though I do have a degree of science, I know enough to know that I don't know as much as he does. So, I choose to listen rather than speak, even if his thoughts might be a little "out there". He thinks differently - and that's ok.

[doctordave]

@HadeanAgent  If by "being creative" you mean "Making up stuff that sounds like science to people who don't know any better" then I agree with you 100%

[HadeanAgent]

@doctordave He's being creative. Not all people who are creative are quacks. Your argument holds absolutely no water.

[doctordave]

@Darktree512 Having a PhD isn't a 100% safeguard against being a quack. Here's a hint: When someone invents their own words for something that scientists already have a word for? They are probably a quack. (see "poppin the quiff")