(05) Why We Fight: "Divide and Conquer" (ca. 1943) 5/6

SUBSCRIBE TO EXCELLENT WORLD WAR II ERA VIDEOS
Divide and Conquer (1943) was the third film of Frank Capra's Why We Fight propaganda film series, dealing with the Nazi conquest of Western Europe in 1940.
The film begins immediately after the fall of Poland. Of the two major Western Allies of 1940, the United Kingdom is first to be mentioned. The role of the Royal Navy in blockading Germany is highlighted, in that it means that Germany must overcome British resistance in order to clear the way for its world conquest.
Hitler's treachery towards the small neutral countries of Europe is exposed - to Denmark: "We have concluded a non-aggression pact with Denmark" - to Norway: "Germany never had any quarrel with the Northern States and has none today" - to the Netherlands: "The new Reich has always endeavored to maintain the traditional friendship with Holland" - and to Belgium: "The Reich has put forth no claim which may in any way be regarded as a threat to Belgium". These quotes are repeated after the conquest of each of these countries is shown.
The first targets of the Nazis in 1940 were Denmark and Norway. Nazi interest in Norway is described in terms of Germany's desire to use Norway's fjords as U-boat bases, and to use airfields in Norway for a bomber attack on the British naval base at Scapa Flow. After Hitler's surprise invasion of Denmark is briefly mentioned, the film accuses the Nazis of using Trojan Horse ships - designed to look like merchant ships but concealing troops, tanks and artillery guns - as a way of seizing control of all of Norway's ports. The role of Norwegian traitors such as Vidkun Quisling in aiding the Nazi conquest of Norway is also emphasized. At the end of the section on Norway, Hitler is likened to gangster John Dillinger and Nazi-occupied Norway is portrayed as the northern claw of a giant pincer movement aimed against Britain. The conquest of France would provide the southern claw.
The film's story of France begins in 1914 at the Battle of the Marne. The offensive-minded spirit of French general Ferdinand Foch is emphasized: "My right is driven in, my center is giving way, the situation is excellent, I attack!" (the original in French is displayed on-screen). The film then goes on to describe the defensive orientation of 1930s France, exemplified by the Maginot Line. This is explained as being primarily due to the 6 million casualties which France suffered in World War I, but also due to factors including Nazi fifth column activities, political corruption and greedy vested interests.
Possible routes for a German invasion of France are discussed: the 1870 attack through Alsace-Lorraine and the 1914 attack through Belgium. The French, believing the Maginot Line impregnable, expect the German attack to come through Belgium, as in 1914. The French order of battle in 1940 is described: 78 divisions along the border with Belgium, 15 in the Maginot Line, 10 divisions facing Mussolini's forces in Italy and 3½ divisions as a safeguard against Spain. The British Expeditionary Force contributed an additional 10 divisions.
The important role of paratroopers in the conquest of Holland is covered, as is the fact that the Germans easily defeated Belgian resistance at Fort Eben-Emael knowing the best method of attack after extensive practice on an exact copy of the fortress built in occupied Czechoslovakia. Special attention is also paid to Nazi atrocities, such as the bombing of Rotterdam (which according to the film was after the surrender of the Netherlands) and Nazi attacks on villages and small towns (designed to choke roads with refugees and thus impede the Allied troop movements).
It is then mentioned that the Nazis' attack on Belgium and Holland was a feint to distract from the main attack through the Ardennes, where the Allies least expected it. A U.S. military officer shows an animation which demonstrates the German blitzkrieg technique - tanks form the front spearhead, while infantry spill off from the sides to form solid walls, thus protecting the center of the column through which trucks pass to supply all forces involved. France Germany why we fight British Nazi Poland World War II

Category:

Education

Tags:

• World
• War
• II
• Nazi
• why
• we
• fight
• frank
• capra
• Divide
• and
• Conquer
• Allied
• British
• France
• Germany
• 1940
• Holland

[Asskick187]

everytime im watchin vids like that, i wonder how many faces i've seen in this vid came back to their hometown alive. brave soldiers on both sides allies and axis.

[Keiji96]

wow that diagram of how the germans punched through france is the best description i've ever seen.

[lijger1]

German lost (for a great part) the war @dunkirk.

they could destroy the main enlgish army

[tommy131188]

@glutinousmaximus Yes, you are right, of course, refering to "Tuchacevsky's deep battle" doctrine, from which the german and the british military inspired.

Germany had tanks of its own at the end of WW1 but those were some very big and clumsy machines, looking like a matchbox.

It is the fact that Hitler considered armored spearhead assault more as a tactical strike, with immediat tactical goals, than an operational assault, with strategic obj and a decisive thrust.

[glutinousmaximus]

@tommy131188 True, but Guderian had been a very early advocate of good ways to use armour. I have his book 'Achtung Panzer' somewhere in my collection. Hitler, in fact critised Guderian several times - all powers in fact were skeptical of the use of armour except perhaps Russia in the 30's. I seem to remember that at the end of WW1, Germany had around 30 tanks - all of them captured from the allies!

[glutinousmaximus]

@FabiogtwZZ Correct. Was the 6th, but I believe Brazil has just moved up.

[FabiogtwZZ]

@scotter420wigb lol england isnt 3rd rate power, it has the 7 biggest economy if im not mistaken

[CalicoVall]

@scotter420wigb ...and you're just gonna sit back and let it happen? Bullshit.

If you are... well, no wonder it is.

[JBnotthescotch]

@ubermensch81 no you are not intelligent

[ubermensch81]

@JBnotthescotch hahahahahahahh ... no ... just one intelligent red neck ....

[JBnotthescotch]

@ubermensch81 spoken like true white trash