Preemptive War Debate (Part 8)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (8)
-
And while you sit there, listening to your Alex Jones-esque parody of complex issues, you will blame Zionists, Bilderberg and misc corporations while excusing violent criminals who wish to destroy the free society you choose to live under. A Ronald Edsforth doesn't even have time for your kind, because your nonsense doesn't even deserve debate.
On behalf of the victims who suffered from extremist Islamic terrorism: FUCK YOU.
Have a nice day and get on with your life.
-
Your 'THOU SHALT NOT'S IN THE NAME OF GOD' should push you to understand the evil that is created in such a non-existent beings' name.
Whether liberal or conservative, your conspiracy theory has been refuted outright. Every rational explanation given to you is 'part of the act' anyone who dares claim nonsense where it fits is only worthy of the title of 'sheep'
Foolish and ignorant, your melodramatics ruin factual analysis.
-
I wish that's all it took thaglund. There's certainly no reasoning with them, lol.
-
I still don't buy the story of 9/11, why does everyone always use that as an excuse for wars. Since the American Dream didn't work they promise to protect us from an exaggerated bogyman who lives in a cave. No one in a cave pulled that off. Some of us actually think. Thou SHALT NOT believe all thou art told. Thou SHALT seek knowledge and truth constantly. Thou SHALT NOT forget the atrocities committed in the name of god.
I LOVE how it just ends there with VDH's incredible comment and doesn't even bother with "the other guy". It was made apparent early in this debate that it didn't really matter what he thought anyway, he was obliterated before he even took the podium. Poor chap.
bestdionysus 3 years ago 4
Edsforth is an idealist (indeed, a "dreamer") when it comes to what is needed to promote peace and democracy. Hanson is a realist and
desires to bring people into a democratic form of government who have never experienced
it's many blessings. What is really telling in this debate is the mutually exclusive views on the nature of man, that says much!
Carlrayb 4 years ago 2