Deep Universe: Hubble's Universe Unfiltered

Take a look at some of the most distant galaxies Hubble has ever seen, and find out why, when we look at the most distant objects in the universe, we are also seeing the cosmos' earliest objects.

"Hubble's Universe" is a recurring broadcast from HubbleSite, online home of the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophysicist Frank Summers takes viewers on an in-depth tour of the latest Hubble discoveries. Find more episodes at HubbleSite.org.

Hubble's Deepest View of the Universe Unveils Bewildering Galaxies across Billions of Years
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1996/01/

Hubble's Deepest View Ever of the Universe Unveils Earliest Galaxies
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/07/

Hubble Approaches the Final Frontier: The Dawn of Galaxies
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/28/

Hubble Reaches the "Undiscovered Country" of Primeval Galaxies
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2010/02/

In Deep Galaxy Surveys, Astronomers Get a Boost -- from Gravity
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2011/04/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Hubble Space Telescope
• Frank Summers
• Hubble's Universe
• HubbleSite
• NASA

[AgimA74]

Hmm, so if you look in every direction in the sky you will see these proto galaxies? Something doesn't add up, that would mean that the universe is much older than the postulated 14 billion years. Another thing that is somehow bizarre is that all are red shifted because the space itself is expanding and the galaxies arent moving, according to the dude. Does that mean that the space between Andromeda and the Milky Way is schrinking? Don't think so...

[harikrishnan92]

Thanks for the great information,sir...expecting more videos from you....

[supergiuovane]

@Typho0n86 "Cause thats as far as we can see with the expansion of the universe". My question was: why we live in this very special region of the universe where no stars were formed more than 13 Gyr ago. And if the universe is expanding... What's causing this expansion?And also: if you trace back the expansion, what do you end up with...?

[supergiuovane]

@Typho0n86 You keep asking me this question and I keep replying the same: it's the disk of our galaxy. It is made of dust, atomic gas and molecular gas. These are the main components of the interstellar medium in a galaxy. But, AGAIN, it is only a disk and it DOES NOT HAVE HOMOGENEOUS EMISSION.If you remove this component, you're still left with the CMB.

[sbergman27]

@Typho0n86 You just admitted that the Consensus Cosmology is correct. You don't know it. But you did. My recommendation is to go to the post where I outlined what you would have to do to vet some alternative CMB source, along with the WMAP pdf file I linked, & work out why what you just said is exactly such an admission. But far more significantly, the angular power function of the thermal anisotropies absolutely smashes the idea you stubbornly cling to. But math is necessary to understand why.

[supergiuovane]

@Typho0n86 The Galaxy disk, of course. But it IS only a disk. Actually, when the do measurements of the CMB the disk emission has to be removed. Would you like to read more about it? I have a very nice, though quite technical paper about Plank's results.

[supergiuovane]

@Typho0n86 Actually when the BB theory was first formulated, the CMB was not observed, but it was one of the consequences of the theory. A prediction, in a sense. And, once again: NO. There is not DUST emitting at such a low temperature with such a distribution as homogeneous as observed. Really. This is NOT a point.

[sbergman27]

@Typho0n86 "Where did i say he knew little physics?"

In your response to me. Here'e the direct quote:

""Einstein didnt need it, he was able to come up with the theory of relativity with little physics and maths knowlage[sic],""

As I mentioned previously, you *do* make quite a lot of awkward backpedaling attempts.

[Typho0n86]

@supergiuovane I dont know who keeps flaging ur stuff as spam but its not me lol

[Typho0n86]

@sbergman27 Im not pretending to know the details of the BB, the standard model is. Both the theorys dont agree with each other and break down, so then they assume that the CMBR came from the BB. But like you said it can come from dust. What if its just the tempature of space around/close to us