A New Standard for Deception

In an information-packed presentation of 58 minutes Kevin Ryan delivers a damning indictment of the official investigations of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7. Ryan's solid scholarship and application of the scientific method stands in stark contrast to the official investigations, whose dishonesty and corrupt anti-scientific methods Ryan exposes in abundance. Ryan explains details of the investigation by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) not acknowledged by the Institute, such as its failure to experimentally verify the floor pancake theory, forcing it to invent a new theory about the Towers' collapse. Ryan notes commonalities in the WTC investigations by NIST and FEMA, and the investigation of the 1995 Oklahoma City Building, such as a high degree of overlap in the leaders of the respective investigations. Ryan unquestionably qualifies as a whistleblower. Having been promoted to the top manager of Underwriter's Laboratories water testing division, Ryan was dismissed on November of 2004 after an e-mail from him to Dr Frank Gayle of NIST questioning the collapse of the twin towers became public.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• s11
• wtc
• wtc7
• silverstein
• usa
• bush
• plane
• tvfakery
• 911
• 9/11
• truth
• 911Revolution
• conspiracy

[FirefoxMancer]

VIEW 1337!

[thedman113]

"Wrong! Aluminum doesnt appear reddish when melted"

Ah, another twoofer who doesn't know that color is a function of temperature, not material. Please go to Google Images, type in "molten aluminum", and let me know if any of it is orange.

Seriously, if you're going to come here and debate me, you'd better know your science.

[thedman113]

"The core steel columns DIDNT collapse"

The core columns of the Madrid tower were concrete, not steel, and THAT is the whole point. The upper level floors were steel framed, and they all collapsed completely. Don't come in here thinking you know about the Madrid tower until you learn how it was constructed.

[undajun2]

Wrong! Aluminum doesnt appear reddish when melted nor can it remain molten for an extended time when separated from a constant heat source. Anyway, why do i even bother? People who are insincere and brainwashed are hardly worth trying to present scientific evidence too. They were already moved by the sentimental conviction that "the government couldnt have done this!" before they even took any time to consider the scientific tenable evidence otherwise. All truth has bounced off their skull since

[undajun2]

Several hundred times more massive inherently means it has several hundred times more support and strength. A structure weighing 10 pounds and only 3 feet tall may be less secure then one that is 100+ stories and weighing millions. It depends on the structural integrity and design.

Your trying to claim something an improper "conspiracy theory" while only being able to make skewed, inaccurate, and fraudulent arguments against it disgusts me.

Your point is facile.

[undajun2]

you are trying to be foolish on purpose right?

The core steel columns DIDNT collapse, which is the whole point. And yes, some of floor structure collapsed after clearly being attacked by raging fires for hours upon hours...

yet still THE STEEL DIDNT COLLAPSE.

Now look at how the WTCs collapsed. See the difference? If you are actually as foolish as you have made your self appear to be you dont even deserve this response which nothing more then common sense you should already be endowed with.

[fflamingmoe]

I take buildings down for a living and all you got to do is look at the shape of the steel and is called the slip effect.hahaha sheep i tell you i can't believe this.And i seen this before they took the steel away.

[fflamingmoe]

i Can't believe what the fuck i'm hearing.

[fflamingmoe]

WELL THATS GOOD NEWS

[thedman113]

I'm not saying there was, but if someone saw molten metal, it would have been aluminum.