Wikileaks on "Climategate" ...

... Fight with the truth

Skewed and partial e-mails do not disprove anthropogenic climate change.

Gavin Schmidt of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies sums it up:

"There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research ... no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no 'marching orders' from shadowy socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords."
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
--------------------


http://wikileaks.org




"I think we understand the mechanisms of CO2 and climate better than we do of what causes lung cancer...In fact, it is fair to say that global warming may be the most carefully and fully studied scientific topic in human history."
--- Ralph Cicerone, President of the National Academy of Sciences


A Center for Public Integrity analysis of Senate lobbying disclosure forms shows that more than 770 companies and interest groups hired an estimated 2,810 lobbyists to influence federal policy on climate change in 2009 as the issue gathered momentum and came to a vote on Capitol Hill.
Increase of more than 400% in the number of lobbyists on climate change in just six years.
Washington has more than five! (anti-)climate lobbyists for every! member of Congress.
http://www.tinyurl.com/oiltrolls

WikiLeaks has probably produced more scoops in its short life than the Washington Post has in the past 30 years
_________________________________

The latest and thankfully last review of the emails hacked from the climatic research unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia
http://www.cce-review.org/pdf/FINAL%20REPORT.pdf



____________
man made climate change a hoax? this way...
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/exxon_report.pdf

http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/download/default.html

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

http://www.realclimate.org

http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/

http://nasascience.nasa.gov/earth-science/climate-variability-and-change/rese...

http://tamino.wordpress.com/climate-data-links/

http://ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring/networks

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/denier-vs-skeptic

http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/exxon_report.pdf

http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/climate-denial-the-stupid-it-burns/

http://exxonsecrets.greenpeace.org/blog/exxonsecrets/

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/temperature-records-r...

http://desmogblog.com/global-warming-denier-database??

----------------

"Skepticism' is a tactic of an elite-driven counter-movement designed to combat environmentalism, and that the successful use of this tactic has contributed to the weakening of US commitment to environmental protection."
http://www.tinyurl.com/2fd8krn

*wake up*
... or stay in wonderland.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• assange
• climate
• daniel
• wikileaks
• wilileaks
• environmental
• sceptics
• agw
• science
• nasa
• 002
• .wmv
• 91177info
• klmagate
• umweltschutz
• CO2
• menschengemachter
• IPCC
• IPPC
• wildly
• wilfully
• misinterpreted
• mainstream
• wikilaeks
• wikileagues
• wikipedia
• wiki-leaks
• medien
• julian
• asange
• kommentar
• world
• change
• wandel
• heat
• 001.avi

[mphello]

Sorry to say: Julian Assange and his cohort did a TERRIBLE rambling job of explaining ... what? I'm not sure exactly. What was their point?

They felt some British government agency was trying to frame Wikileaks?

I still thumbed this video up anyway, for at least it being open and unbiased. But, nevertheless: I really HATE listening to Assange speak (elsewhere, too) and fumble through trying to justify anything he does, even though *I* have my OWN reasons to believe he does great good.

[mphello]

This woman asking this question is SMART! She is not a fucked-in-the-brain shithead Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) denier. She's not brainwashed by the coal and conservative agenda.

[illuminatedgirl]

I like wiki