Free Speech by mob or principle?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
324 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 30, 2009

Free Speech lawyer Douglas Christie comments on the demonstration for the George Galloway case on March 29, 2009, and discusses the question of who is entitled to freedom of speech; is it "for me, or thee, too"?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There was no, and there is no censorship of Galloway. If there was, he would not have been able to give his video speech. He was told weeks earlier by his own government in the UK that Canada would not allow him in based on Chretien's anti terrorism laws of 2001. Galloway made up the stuff about Kenney and Jewish groups none of which prevented Galloway from entering or speaking in Canada. this video is nonsense.

  • Free speech will only be achieved when the voters stop supporting a political system that pick and chooses, who should be heard.

    I am an injured worker and I have been silenced by a law called the workers compensation act.

    Once injured I become a child of the state and the state can do with me as it pleases and if that means pushing me to suicide, then that is what they will do.

    I have no voice or rights here in Canada, thus I will not support my abuser , I will not vote.

    Wayne C

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more