Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Monsters Resurrected: Biggest Killer Dino

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
97,776
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2009

The killing fields of Africa...ninety-five million years ago. Watch more at dsc.discovery.com/videos/monsters-resurrrected

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • ITT: Kids argue about which dinosaur is better based on no empirical evidence whatsoever.

  • Do you reckon in like 30 million years aliens will be making documentaries which start "Another day in the human killing fields. Fatty boom-booms are gigantic Mcdonalds-eaters. Their size keeps them safe, but their young, whom they attempt to fatten up as quickly as possible, are more vulnerable to attacks from other, better adapted human beings."?

see all

All Comments (246)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @lifeform106 if u look closely, he bites the spine, not the rib

  • All the fails in this video

    Fail 1: 0:29 sauropods could not chew

    Fail 2: 0:35 grass did not evolve yet

    Fail 3: 0:43 rugoys did not have 3 clawed hands

    Fail 4: 0:49 rugoys had a weak jaw and skull

    Fail 5: 0:54 he could not kill by only biting the ribs

    Fail 6: 1:12 spinosaurus hand is not that big as a 30 foot animal

    Fail 7: 1:15 rugoys is not that small in a 5 foot skull

    Fail 8: 1:15 spinosaurus was not a land base killer!

    This is not to the user but the documentary!

  • @dinodude162 that is cause this is the worst dinosaur documentary discovery made!

  • @dayton3200 thanks

  • @dinodude162 ok, i got this.

    1:no dino was ONLY a predator,or ONLY a scavenger.

    2: the dinos are very large, the "grass" is ferns, it just looks smaller 'cause of the largeness of the dinos.

    3: they MASSIVELY oversized the spino, it is maybe 100 feet long in this,

    you're welcome

  • @dinodude162 if u wanna c a dino wit even a chance of picking up a 30 ft rugops, u would want to look at trex, or perhaps charcharodontosaurus, as both were known for having remarkably strong neck mussels, and even these couldn't lift it more then a foot off the ground.

  • @dinodude162 the answer is it doesn't. while huge in length spinosaurus stood on average a mere 20 feet at the crown of the skull and 15 ft at the hip, the same height as trex, a foot or 2 taller then allosaurus, and an insubstantial 5 ft taller than a true rugops. the spinosaurus depicted here killing our poor friend the rugops seems to be no less then 35 ft tall, a gross exaggeration.

  • Ok so let me get this straight.

    1. I thought rugops was a scavenger not a predator

    2. There was grass in the cretaceous period? grass didn't evolve until the late eocene or something like that and

    3. how does a 50 foot long spinosaurus pick up a 25 foot long rugops in one bite???

    So if anyone has answers... please inform me....

  • Poralatitans (however the fuck you spell that) < Rugops (however the fuck you spell that) < Spinosaurus < Meteor

  • OMG 

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more