Noah's Ark - The True Story 6/6

A documentary by Discovery Channel and BBC about the Ark of Noah

Category:

Travel & Events

Tags:

• Noah
• Ark
• True
• Story
• BBC
• Discovery
• Channel

[InternetDarkLord]

@darkmyzreal Are you a Poe?

[Draugh39]

@SpencerBenedict2nd

"Do you doubt His ability in His Word available to those who've passed these past 2000 years?"

Yes. I don't believe in any god at all! It is a fact that the wording in the Bible has changed. Furthermore, I read the Bible in Swedish as well and those texts can't possibly have been affected by these English Bible Societies. Note that Sweden was protestant decades before England was and the Catholic Church (kicked out in 1523) was less of a power there than ever in England.

[darkmyzreal]

WOW moses wrote the Genesis not jewish preists. Interesting how people threw away the flood story for myth of gilgamesh. Even Jesus spoke about Noah's flood. Fact is all civilizations have flood legends, even the incas and indians. This is satans handy work trying to divert people from true worship and the true God. What a waste of time witching this made by people who prefer myth because they cannot understand something.

[dproctor18]

I have concluded from this video that the concept of a global flood is, at best, a rather silly idea indeed.

[Draugh39]

@ironheaven1

The Sumerian and Babylonian texts were written over 2 millennia before that.

Furthermore Mohammed didn't write a single word down, he was analphabetic. The Qur'an was written by many other people and was compiled from these scraps by Uthman over ten years after Mohammed’s death. To claim that it is perfect or undistorted is false.

[ironheaven1]

who wants the true story plz go read the story of Noah (Nouh in Arabic) in the holy Quran, 14 centuries ago some jews asked Muhammed PBUH about this story and he told them the real one

[Draugh39]

@SpencerBenedict2nd

when it comes to Bibles, "newer" is NEVER "better".

Really, so are you saying that we should have stuck with the very first Bible, that of Marcion of Sinope? He who rejected the whole of the Old Testament and wanted to remove any references to it from his Bible? All Bibles we have today is based on christian interpretations and editing that came AFTER him. (and the teaching in that Bible was much more in common with Gnosticism than you see today)

[Draugh39]

@SpencerBenedict2nd

Yes. Earlier more original texts (which is something Erasmus didn't have access to) would mean a closer more correct translation. Hand-copied texts becomes distorted by time, I even hinted that with the comparison between Masoretic texts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, revision and changes appears and that is clear from the history of the Bible - which has gone through many such. Now we have access to earlier material and can thus make a better translation based on those.

[SpencerBenedict2nd]

@Draugh39

"And why would God need to change the original texts, didn't he get it right the first time?" -Draught

"This is why you have modern translations now, we actually have more and older manuscripts now than in 1516."-LogicalDraught

[SpencerBenedict2nd]

@Draugh39 Please beware: when it comes to Bibles, "newer" is NEVER "better".

I suggest you look up the manipulations & corruption's of the "ROMISH" Bible Societies & so-called "Translation" Committees of the likes of, Westcott & Hort and Nestle/Aland. All other English Bibles are rejected as Romish heresy proceeding from corrupt Hebrew & Greek texts secretly amassed by the diabolical Jesuit Papacy.

Do you doubt His ability in His Word available to those who've passed these past 2000 years?