The Bridge
Loading...
Loading...
5:15
Ghost Town 2: Spainby geophilos9,828 views- 0:33
190kg. Overhead Squat for a single (418lbs.)by BigMuscleMilk38,501 views
- 7:45
My Greedy Generationby geophilos1,799 views
- 7:40
Ricardo's Law ~ The Great Tax Clawback Scamby lyrebirdchannel19,163 views
- 8:34
How Gordon Brown Broke Britain....by HarrisonFred1,370 views
- 6:20
Wildwood Trust beaver adventure Part 1by peetasmith11,486 views
- 5:37
Boom Bust 'n Bankers.by HarrisonFred401 views
- 6:42
The work of Wildwood Trust Part 5by peetasmith1752 views
- 2:12
Scottish Green Party Propose Land Value Taxby peetasmith1107 views
- 2:06
Ham Fen Beaver April 2009by peetasmith1173 views
- 4:23
Retooling Property Taxes - Walter Rybeck for ICMAby ICMAvideos557 views
- 9:29
The Silver Bullet Part I The Human Rightby FredHarrisonFilms289 views
- 7:27
The Celtic Tiger Savaged the Irishby HarrisonFred735 views
- 26:49
Keiser Report - Markets! Finance! Scandal! (E12)by RussiaToday14,959 views
- 4:16
Darth Vader Salsa Trombone Playing and Dancingby nytrydr8979,103 views
- 9:01
The Silver Bullet - Part IIby FredHarrisonFilms224 views
- 5:12
The Foreign Press Conference.by HarrisonFred278 views
- 5:49
The work of the Wildwood Trust part 3by peetasmith11,410 views
- 2:48
mark Thomas manifesto of Land Value Taxby peetasmith1680 views
- 7:33
"Fear the Boom and Bust" a Hayek vs. Keynes Rap Anthemby EconStories3,199,772 views
@Macrocompassion
I think you may find the Swedes did shared the bridge costs. But the cost came out of public taxes, while the biggest benefactors were the rich via land values.. Fred emphasisies, the poor taxpayers subsidised the rich
The economic growth the bridge created, soaked into the land and crystalised as land values. This publicly created wealth is siphoned off by landowners
Introduce Land Valuation Tax - those who benefit most pay more for the bridge which makes them rich
NearAbbeyRoad 8 months ago
The point is clearly made.
The added value of the land does not have to stay with the social upper classes society, nor on only one side of the bridge. Why was the building cost not shared by the Sweeds?
With a system of collecting the greater potential productive value of the sites that are affected can new revenue be brought to a country which has previously invested its tax-payers money in some durable capital goods. The bridge gives heavily taxed Danes had more productive land!
Macrocompassion 9 months ago 2