Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Blitz #673 icc5minute14mar20101348pm.wmv (Nimzo-Indian: Fischer variation)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,863
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 14, 2010

Play online turn-based chess at http://www.chessworld.net
or the ICC for blitz chess like this video at : http://www.chessclub.com/from/kingscrusher

[Event "ICC 5 0"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2010.03.14"]
[Round "-"]
[White "KingsCrusher"]
[Black "appel"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2195"]
[BlackElo "2077"]
[Opening "Nimzo-Indian: Fischer variation"]
[ECO "E43"]
[NIC "NI.12"]
[Time "09:42:19"]
[TimeControl "300+0"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e3 b6 5. Nf3 Bb7 6. Bd3 Ne4 7. Qc2 Bxc3+ 8.
bxc3 f5 9. d5 exd5 10. cxd5 Bxd5 11. c4 Bb7 12. Bb2 O-O 13. c5 Na6 14. c6
dxc6 15. Bc4+ Kh8 16. Rd1 Qe7 17. O-O Nb4 18. Qb1 Nd5 19. Qa1 Rad8 20. Ne5
c5 21. a3 Ndf6 22. Rxd8 Rxd8 23. Nf7+ {Black resigns} 1-0

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • i love those pawn sacs... i can never do themself, but when they work out, its so beautiful

  • Amazing blunder at the end. That just goes to show what "raking bishops" can do for an attack.

see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kinscrusher sorry for the late comment but the Rubinstein variation actually has Ne2 instead of Nf3

  • @kingscrusher sorry for the late comment but the rubentien variation has Ne2 instead of Nf3

  • i still doesn't get how kc utilizes those pawn sacks

    for me it would just be blundering material

  • hmmm....you play very sharp blitz games...

  • that was a fun game wot wot with the queen working behind the bishops on a1 and a2....i would personally be way to hysterical about hiding my queen away when i'm two pawns down...i have a lot to learn! I've only been playing chess for 30 years....HA

  • First game I've seen finished on the live games so far - the rest all timed out. I don't think king expected the Rook take from the sounds of it, and yes, the Queen take looked better (though the fork itself more dramatic) because the King can stay put and not walk into the Bishop's line of sight when the Knight takes the Rook. Nice finish!

  • So black should have taken with the Queen and not the rook and this way lose both rooks, and in return get a rook and a knight, while still being up two pawns?

    Instead of giving up both rooks and only getting back one rook.., ok I see know. Thanks!!!

    Either way black is in a bad spot with either position, but yes your right the Queen take is the lesser of two evils.

  • Yes, but the point is that in that line, Black only loses an exchange as opposed to a whole heap of material. Keeping in mind he still has 2 extra pawns, it's not that bad.

  • Same here :) I'm a fool at chess, so I can't play pawn sacks to any real success. Even more, therefore, I enjoy watching a masterful application of the strategaem by somebody like KC, who knows what he's doing :)

  • Nice game!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more