Richard Lindzen, Ph.D. Lecture Deconstructs Global Warming Hysteria

Learn the science behind Global Warming hysteria in light of the recent ClimateGate developments, and share this video everywhere.

(PDF Link of "Curriculum Vitae of Richard Siegmund Lindzen") http://tinyurl.com/yjxpct6

Lindzen WSJ Column Summary of Video: http://tinyurl.com/yh9t9j8

Not only did this Gang of Climate Hysteria Criminals corrupt the science behind global warming (e.g destroying data, excluding dissent from the peer-review process, ignoring FOIA requests, etc.), their science never had any backing.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Richard
• Lindzen
• ClimateGate
• Climate
• Change
• Global
• Warming
• CO2
• Science
• Oberlin
• College
• Emails
• Lee
• Doren
• HowTheWorldWorks

[awish4truth]

When most of the Earth's food crops first appeared 2 million years ago , there was twice the co2 in the atmosphere as today . In fact there has been times in the Earth's resent geological past when co2 levels have been 10 times as great as today . No problem then , no problem now .

[midnight9wanderer]

water vapor far outranks CO2 as such a factor. its has higher specific heat, absorbs over a spectrum many times larger than CO2 or even methane. the latter two are slightly higher than O2 and N2 but not enough at 1%, or even 5% of the atmosphere to do what is being attributed to them. CO2 absorbs about the same spectrum as O3, which is small. regardless, in any gas the avg kinetic energy will be transferred to all gas molecules as entropy will spread it out. human CO2 too is insignificant.

[GarfoyleZanderfield]

@awish4truth

Ernst-Georg Beck of Germany has studied thousands of C02 gas readings made by scientists from between 1812-1960 which may indicate that atmospheric c02 has been in the 300 to 400+ parts per million in the 1800's and recently in the 1940's showing much more fluctuation than the static non changing 280 PPM the IPCC says was the static number for the past hundreds of thousands of years. Hell a Wikipedia articles even says it stayed the same for 20 million years! Not reality.

[StarcrossedPacific]

@kagiso3741 guess who is making billions of dollars every day we don't act upon climate change. It is you who is eating up corporate propaganda and who is fighting for their interest.

[kagiso3741]

@spearfisherman308 Sorry but you are wrong .. there is no evidence ... you are repeating propaganda as if that were the only way to get a good environmental citizen high ... Try fighting for real environmental issues instead of this cap tax trade boondoggle .. which will make some rich very rich .. and political leaders more powerful ... You dont realize what you are fighting for!

[reallysecretusername]

@spearfisherman308 "conservative run European governments" lmao

[spearfisherman308]

HowTheWorks Dude I hate to burst your bubble but scientist around the world have shone tangible evidence of the existence of man-made climate change occurring, even very conservative run European governments are accepting the theory of global warming and guys such as Lindzen only criticize evidence discovered by others and do not launch expeditions of their own to find their own tangible evidence to prove their theory

[LogicalFlawDetector]

@darthcurtin83

Tenure. Even if you defend creationism, you would still have a job if you have tenure. If being not fired is some indication of academic legibility, you should be supporting creationism as well, as there are lots of creationists with tenure. I am a global warming alarmism skeptic.

[TheStigsIndianCousin]

@darthcurtin83 Um, do you know that the MIT meteorology department, full of countless luminaries as bright as Lindzen, basically ACCEPT the science behind Global Warming? Are they any LESS credible?

[klnine]

@midnight9wanderer ...agree and water vapour doesn't appear in the climate models..go figure !

[ecp73]

Smug little fukheads. They will all be embarrassed by the time they grow some genitalia.

[evoneal]

@cypress1337

this isnt just one random phd guy. hes was a harvard and is now an MIT professor on the subject matter.