Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

To Smack or not to Smack - Nzone Focus - PART ONE

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
529 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 26, 2009

As we head into a postal referrendum on Section 59, the jury is still out on the resons for the repeal of section 59, what the law actually says and whether or not a smack should be part of good parental correction. We spoke to Sue Bradford, Bob McCoskrie, Bruce Pilbrow, Hone Kaa and law professor Warren Brookbanks to try an understand the current section 59.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It should be a criminal offence to smack a child because any attempt to define an acceptable level of violence against a child leaves the law open to abuse, as occurred when "reasonable force" was still a legal defence in a case of child abuse.

    Some have said that it is necessary to use force to prevent a child from being harmed. However the current law provides for the use of reasonable force to prevent a child being harmed, harming others or harming property.

  • socialists again are trying to regulate every aspect of our live. The law protects EVERY person (of any age) from abuse - no need for new laws on that matter.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more