@evildeathmonkey1 Me too! I have flown both in simulations, and if you´ve got no Air Defenses...........run. Both can easily wipe out an Armored division with a two-ship.
You can say one thing about both, good if you have them.......bad if the enemy has them!
@LupusAries I guess A-10 and SU-25 both have strong and weak points. Fact remains I don't want to be on the receiving end of either of them. Both are good and effective CAS planes. Seriously, I would shit myself seeing either of them coming after me :|
@saniok676 I do not mean the Cockpits Avionics, a Glass Cockpit is fine and good, the A-10C gets a partly one too. And it definately works. However i meant the View out of the Canopy, wich is much better in the A-10 since it has a buble Canopy and a Higher seat position. If you´re Flying CAS, its eyes out of the Cockpit, and there you can see much more out of the A-10 Cockpit. It also makes detecting a Missile launch much easier. The russian ruggedness however is legendary.
@saniok676 well its ineffective against the Frontal armor, but it is definately effective againt the side and rear armor. If a Pilot is smart he will always go for the side or rear. Well the Uranium is a Problem. However rockets are not that effective as You think, given that they are neither HEAT (shaped charge) nor a Kinect Penetrator. Against lightly armored targets they are effective, not however against a Main Battle Tanks.
@Mifodiy35 Hmm not against the A-10C that is one hell of a CAS aircraft. And lets not forget, the sight out of the A-10 Cockpit is definately much, much better. Wich counts alot at low altitudes. Still that capability increase was much needed.
But in their special roles as CAS and tank killer, the A-10 is No. 1, I think! Cannon is more powerful, heavier weaponlead possible...and you need slow aircraft like the A-10 while working close with the ground troops. Su-25 is already too fast for that job in my opinion. But it's right, slower aircraft = better target.
@evildeathmonkey1 Me too! I have flown both in simulations, and if you´ve got no Air Defenses...........run. Both can easily wipe out an Armored division with a two-ship.
You can say one thing about both, good if you have them.......bad if the enemy has them!
LupusAries 1 year ago
@LupusAries I guess A-10 and SU-25 both have strong and weak points. Fact remains I don't want to be on the receiving end of either of them. Both are good and effective CAS planes. Seriously, I would shit myself seeing either of them coming after me :|
evildeathmonkey1 1 year ago
This speaker man is stoned
fuck4freei 1 year ago
Hasn't helped!!! All planes have been destroyed!
WaspSL 1 year ago
@saniok676 I do not mean the Cockpits Avionics, a Glass Cockpit is fine and good, the A-10C gets a partly one too. And it definately works. However i meant the View out of the Canopy, wich is much better in the A-10 since it has a buble Canopy and a Higher seat position. If you´re Flying CAS, its eyes out of the Cockpit, and there you can see much more out of the A-10 Cockpit. It also makes detecting a Missile launch much easier. The russian ruggedness however is legendary.
LupusAries 1 year ago
@saniok676 well its ineffective against the Frontal armor, but it is definately effective againt the side and rear armor. If a Pilot is smart he will always go for the side or rear. Well the Uranium is a Problem. However rockets are not that effective as You think, given that they are neither HEAT (shaped charge) nor a Kinect Penetrator. Against lightly armored targets they are effective, not however against a Main Battle Tanks.
LupusAries 1 year ago
@Mifodiy35 Hmm not against the A-10C that is one hell of a CAS aircraft. And lets not forget, the sight out of the A-10 Cockpit is definately much, much better. Wich counts alot at low altitudes. Still that capability increase was much needed.
LupusAries 1 year ago
lolSU25 nefer be the killet of t-1- stupid jerk!
TheHummel1 2 years ago
Sure, if it comes to direct dogfight...
But in their special roles as CAS and tank killer, the A-10 is No. 1, I think! Cannon is more powerful, heavier weaponlead possible...and you need slow aircraft like the A-10 while working close with the ground troops. Su-25 is already too fast for that job in my opinion. But it's right, slower aircraft = better target.
Dubblegum19 2 years ago
orly???
VPovver 2 years ago