Microsoft Optical Mouse Blue Review

Mouse stats below
ambidextrous
perfect control speed 1m/s
if the polling rate 1000hz perfect control speed 1.5/ms
no mouse prediction
liftoff distance 3mm
sensor position center
weight is less than 79grams
tiny plastic mouse feet
2 buttons + clickable scroll wheel

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Microsoft
• Optical
• Mouse
• Blue
• Review
• Ramla777
• Reviews

[devilMiro]

whats the music?

[Ramla777]

@devilMiro search ganginati the song is called internal flow..

[askdrax]

I used an MS Blue for years for CS 1.6, and although it has a low maximum tracking speed (1-1.5 m/s) the 'negative acceleration' is extremely consistent, and I virtually never had any 'random error' problems like some newer mice (aiming at the sy or floor suddenly)

For a mouse that costs $19.99 the MS Blue or MS WheelMouse Optical are a great choice :)

[wojtekc27]

good review i own this mouse

[CameronS654321]

@askdrax Yeah apparently I lot of pro league CS 1.6 players used to use this mouse and apparently a lot still do. Isn't it worse though if it has a low tracking speed?

[EndlessLands]

I believe this mouse was first available in 2002. I bought one on a whim in 2003. I am still using it today, Feb 11th, 2011. I did not use a mouse pad. It's performed better than any mouse I ever used (including the $79 logitech G9X). I work at home and spend a gigantic amount of time using this mouse for work and gaming.

I am sadly finally about to replace the Microsoft Optical Blue. If only I knew how great it'd be back then, I would have bought more of them.

[christpunchers]

The blue mouse performance wise is no different than a 1.1 and WMO. The only difference is the shell and this actually has a nicer, less stiff cord. One drawback is its mouse feets, they're too damn small but of course you can just use glide tape or Teflon replacements.

[djabhishek2361991]

wheelmouse is better than it for cs i have both of them