9-11 Truth, Chomsky and Assange

Chomsky and Assange have one thing in common, they both dismiss 9-11 truth as a "conspiracy theory". We can disagree with them.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9-11 Truth
• Chomsky
• Assange

[macro202]

7:55 "Huge buildings do not collapse in free fall for no reason"

I see you are clearly an expert in demolitions as well as construction.

O_O see the problem?

[allenjasson]

@macro202 Well, it's not actually my comment, but I strongly agree with it. Actually, I'm not "an expert in demolitions as well as construction" but I have a brain and am quite well-versed in common sense; a capability that is obviously not universal. North and South towers - completely reduced to rubble - in their respective footprints - in a zero-structural-resistance, free-fall collapse due to the impact of planes in the upper floors. Building 7 - likewise - but NO PLANE. (-_-) Wake up!!

[carpet691]

your accent is no cover of your stupidity

[allenjasson]

@carpet691 Yours, on the other hand is universally associated with it.

[beethovenfan3]

carrot/stick incentives....have you birthed a new political science term, or shall i consult Chomsky and see if you're brimming to the lid with shit or not? I'm guessing yes.  Stop wasting your time. I'm just trying to browse youtube to hear as much of Noam as I can, and not have him interrupted by your pathetic conspiracy concoctions. Seriously, wake the fuck up

[DaPs166]

Yes, those planes were cartoons and anyone who doesn't agree is a government shill. Get a life! Maybe look at something which is interesting about 9/11, like the truck filled with explosives on the bridge.... Instead of clutching at straws with bullshit

[newsmanbluesman]

According to Ms Rice: WTCc plane attack couldnt be expected; the towers' collapses we're told though could have been, once planes hit. Giuliani seemed to say they were coming down, contemporaneously. More than one hijack could not be expected, was baffling to FAA; but game-returns on their radar & so many excerises set same-day, could be; questioning of hijackers at boarding gate couldn't be expected, but their subsequent permission to fly, could be. All these, reality in reverse.

[donteatthefishsticks]

Serious issues that really matter: asserting democratic control over the society and the economy. Organizing. Taking over your workplace. Getting people elected to parliament/congress/legislatur­es and holding their feet to the fire to challenge real, visible, indisputable concentrations of power - large corporations/banks, the "moneyed elite" that Jefferson warned of. Opposing austerity measures and demanding large-scale transfers of wealth downward, instead of upward.

[Kubstofferson]

@Kubstofferson But it's easier to pretend that movie-style ancient secret societies are responsible for all global events, as part of one giant plan.

It's irrationality at its worst... you've been open minded enough to reject the mainstream, but have then signed up for this kind of speculative rubbish. What a waste

[Kubstofferson]

It's much easier to label Noam Chomsky as "working for the CIA" and a "shill" than to actually read through and understand his decades-long work, isn't it?

If anyone actually bothered to look into what Chomsky has been saying for decades, they would discover that he has consistently been opposed to U.S./Israeli imperialism and neo-liberal/disaster capitalism, factors which encompass all of the 9/11 events and the Iraq/Afghanistan wars (plus the conflicts of previous decades)

[zedonutube]

@carpet691, I think you are very out of touch!

Wake up!

[DKDiddley]

These opinions are baloney. I think it's you who is probably working for the CIA.

[heloizyjhenifer]

I'm sure you're a moon landing hoax believer too. It's exactly the same caliber, the same amount of "proof" for it out there, it fits you.