Chuck Liddell on The Opie & Anthony Show 2008
Loading...
45,966
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (75)
-
@shakir2 agreed the cage is far more reliable for a wrestler than in a ring plus somebody could get tied up in the ropes and they stand you up
-
DUMB
-
@pearcemark2 Coleman's not that old, and I think he would give Forrest a tough time.
-
@MoneyIsSilver I don't think Forrest would have a razor close fight with a 68 year old Mark Coleman.
-
@pearcemark2 Do you honestly think Forrest is as good of a fighter as either Jones or Rua?
-
@MoneyIsSilver Is that gonna be the excuse against Jones too?
-
Forest only beat Shogun cause Shogun's knee was jacked up.
-
@Pepitoigles Haha touche good sir
-
@MikeyS01 and he also fought tito 2 times and beat him both times.
-
rampage beat the shit out of chuck once in the ring and the other time in the ufc
Loading...
Forrest is gonna beat rampage!! wait and see!
julian7878 3 years ago 16
Cage VS Ring argument is valid to some extent. Couture said it's very different, obviously Chuck doesn't agree with him but that's his opinion.
I think the main difference is "the knees to downed opponent" rule. That changes everything for wrestlers like Matt Hughes/Sean Sherk. In the UFC, wrestlers do not get "penalized" for failing takedown after takedown, 'cause they don't have to worry about getting kneed in the face.(which can potentially turn into a KO)
shakir2 3 years ago 4