Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

How to think lesson for Pseudo Skeptics - Victor Zammit

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,464
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2009

Thinking explained very very slowly for Pseudo Skeptics.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (kimbo99)

  • Type in google: One Thousand Pounds Challenge To Victor Zammit. He refused it in a very childish manner after Simon Forsyth prooved that he lied to us about his "interview" with Alan Crossley.

  • @Kalasanty11- Unimpressive is the lengthy He said- she said argument. Anyone could type that page up. Ever heard of disinformation? It could be extended indefinitely by a malicious mind. It could become a career for one poison pen writer.

    Skeptics are notorious lifelong liars.

Top Comments

  • What skeptics fail to understand is that skepticism involves being skeptical of your own position, it does not mean just being skeptical of that which you do not believe in, otherwise we are all skeptics and that renders their use of the term "skeptic" as meaningless. A true skeptic casts skepticism on their own position as well. Since the Randi crowd do not employ skepticism in this respect then they are fairly termed pseudo skeptics and demean the term skepticism.

  • He's discussing the tactics of pseudo-skeptics - so he is addressing intellectual toddlers. :)

    And boy can those toddlers scream and dribble and soil themselves with rage.

see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ProudToBLoud Even worse is this sell out brown nosing shill for the illuminati and TPTB, schmirker extraordinaire, Michael Schemer. This creep is a traitor to all of humanity as he falsely slams every hope and dream humanity has for freeing ourselves from the mind control agenda of the NWO owned by TPTB. He is not remotely objective or scientific, he just parrots exactly the lies and fraud of the elite. He is obviously a paid disinfo shill whose arrogance is unbridled and idiotic!

  • @MISTERASMODEUS Type pseudoskeptic into wiki and you will see what a jackass you are.

  • Wow. Another amazing con artist or just plain insane. There is no such thing as a pseudoskeptic. You are either a skeptic or not. It is YOUR job to prove Your case beyond any doubt. Whatever a "psychic" laboratory is hardly counts as anything other than typical quackery by lying parasites

  • @Kalasanty11 --And I m very skeptical you are even in Poland as you claim. You are operating anonimously out of whats called a sock account. An identity launderer. Most commonly done by lying deceiving skeptics. I HOPE THAT I AM WRONG. Cold reading is a fantasy invented. by skeptics. They first deceive themselves then attempt to sell it to others in paperback books. BE SKEPTICAL TOWARD THAT BOOK. Mary Roach has discovered fraud? Its in every aspect of human activity. Most every AD is fraud

  • @kimbo99 Everyone who doesn't share your point of view is "lifelong liar". And you call ME narcist? Besides, I wasn't writing about "evidences outside Zammit" - I'm going to watch carefully yours other videos, and maybe even believe you after that. I was talking only about Zammits "witnesses". Read that book of Mary Roach to notice how easy is to deceive people in desperation. Don't even bother with reply. I'm not going to back here anyway.

  • @Kalasanty11 Carefully note your own narcissism calling me baby pointing out your "natural" superiority. Your campaign against afterlife is a suicidal tendency. Skeptics desire extinguishment.because their current life is full of suffering.They can't face yet more life. Tons of evidence of afterlife outside Zammit. Villifying him wont change the vast body of evidence.--Other interpretations- Skeptics are not worth talking to thus silence can have more than your wishful meaning.Cheers

  • @Kalasanty11 "That alone is good evidence" You are meaning nothing, no response, is good evidence ! C'mon. "Trust"-- I don't thrust anyone labelling themselves a skeptic because its a personality defect associated with autism, narcissisim and frequently, (not all) childhood molestation which leads to professional full time lying. Its also medically associated with chronic depression and reduced lifespan. All in all a disability package. I have no fear of dying. And I don't depend on Zammit.

  • If you want to know how this "medium thing" works, read book Spook by Mary Roach

  • @kimbo99 If you are going to trust guy whose the best evidences are voices in the dark only STATING that they are Alan Crossley that's your own problem... talking about anecdotal... Hypocrisy. Simon Forsyth didn't insulted Zammit. He just wanted him to proove that was really Crossley. He didn't accept the challenge. That alone is good evidence. But if Zammit doing is going to quench your fear of dying I can't actually despise him. It's like consoling the little babies.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more